public SiblingIterator(UsdPrimSiblingRange range)
{
m_range = range;
m_cur = range.GetStart();
m_end = range.GetEnd();
m_primed = false;
}
public static bool Equals(UsdPrimSiblingIterator lhs, UsdPrimSiblingIterator rhs)
{
bool ret = UsdCsPINVOKE.UsdPrimSiblingIterator_Equals(UsdPrimSiblingIterator.getCPtr(lhs), UsdPrimSiblingIterator.getCPtr(rhs));
if (UsdCsPINVOKE.SWIGPendingException.Pending)
{
throw UsdCsPINVOKE.SWIGPendingException.Retrieve();
}
return(ret);
}
// ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ //
// Enumerator
// ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ //
public virtual void Dispose()
{
if (m_cur != null)
{
m_cur.Dispose(); m_cur = null;
}
if (m_range != null)
{
m_range.Dispose(); m_range = null;
}
}
public static bool operator==(UsdPrimSiblingIterator lhs, UsdPrimSiblingIterator rhs)
{
// The Swig binding glue will re-enter this operator comparing to null, so
// that case must be handled explicitly to avoid an infinite loop. This is still
// not great, since it crosses the C#/C++ barrier twice. A better approache might
// be to return a simple value from C++ that can be compared in C#.
bool lnull = lhs as object == null;
bool rnull = rhs as object == null;
return((lnull == rnull) && ((lnull && rnull) || UsdPrimSiblingIterator.Equals(lhs, rhs)));
}
public void Reset()
{
m_cur = m_range.GetStart();
m_primed = false;
}
override public bool Equals(object rhs)
{
return(UsdPrimSiblingIterator.Equals(this, rhs as UsdPrimSiblingIterator));
}
internal static global::System.Runtime.InteropServices.HandleRef getCPtr(UsdPrimSiblingIterator obj)
{
return((obj == null) ? new global::System.Runtime.InteropServices.HandleRef(null, global::System.IntPtr.Zero) : obj.swigCPtr);
}
public UsdPrimSiblingIterator GetEnd()
{
UsdPrimSiblingIterator ret = new UsdPrimSiblingIterator(UsdCsPINVOKE.UsdPrimSiblingRange_GetEnd(swigCPtr), true);
return(ret);
}
