public static void ParseBatchResponse(BatchResponse response)
{
string contentType = response.ContentType;
string[] pieces = contentType.Split(new string[] { "; boundary=" }, StringSplitOptions.None);
if (pieces.Length < 2)
AstoriaTestLog.FailAndThrow(String.Format("Could not retrieve boundary from response's content-type header. Value found was '{0}'", contentType));
string boundary = pieces[1].Trim();
// even if content-id is specified, we may not get it back in error cases. This doesn't feel entirely correct, it seems like there should
// always be a 1-1 mapping that explicitly honors content-id's
// TODO: responses / requests without content IDs should be matched up in order within changeset only
// changesets should have the right number of responses too
BatchRequest batchRequest = response.Request as BatchRequest;
List<ResponseFragment> unmatchedFragments = new List<ResponseFragment>();
List<AstoriaRequest> unmatchedRequests = batchRequest.Requests
.Union(batchRequest.Changesets.SelectMany(changeset => changeset.AsEnumerable()))
.ToList();
using (StringReader reader = new StringReader(response.Payload))
{
foreach (ResponseFragment fragment in ParseBatchResponse(reader, boundary))
{
AstoriaRequest request = null;
if (fragment.ContentID != null)
request = unmatchedRequests
.FirstOrDefault(r => r.Headers.ContainsKey("Content-ID")
&& r.Headers["Content-ID"].Equals(fragment.ContentID));
if (request == null)
unmatchedFragments.Add(fragment);
else
{
unmatchedRequests.Remove(request);
response.Responses.Add(FragmentToResponse(request, fragment));
}
}
}
if (unmatchedFragments.Any())
{
if (unmatchedFragments.Count < unmatchedRequests.Count)
AstoriaTestLog.WriteLine("Warning: recieved fewer batch response fragments than expected");
else if (unmatchedFragments.Count > unmatchedRequests.Count)
AstoriaTestLog.FailAndThrow("Recieved more batch fragments than expected");
for (int i = 0; i < unmatchedFragments.Count; i++)
{
response.Responses.Add(FragmentToResponse(unmatchedRequests[i], unmatchedFragments[i]));
}
}
}
public virtual AstoriaResponse GetResponse()
{
LogRequest();
OnSend(this);
// NOTHING should come in between this and actually sending the request
#if !ClientSKUFramework
SetupAPICallLog();
#endif
AstoriaResponse response;
if (AstoriaTestProperties.BatchAllRequests)
{
BatchRequest batchRequest = new BatchRequest(Workspace);
if (Verb_Internal == RequestVerb.Get)
{
batchRequest.Add(this);
}
else
{
BatchChangeset changeset = batchRequest.GetChangeset();
changeset.Add(this);
}
BatchResponse batchResponse = batchRequest.GetResponse() as BatchResponse;
response = batchResponse.Responses.FirstOrDefault();
}
else
{
response = RequestSender.SendRequest(this);
}
#if !ClientSKUFramework
// NOTHING should come in between this and actually recieving the response
RetrieveAPICallLog();
#endif
OnReceive(this, response);
return(response);
}
public static void ParseBatchResponse(BatchResponse response)
{
string contentType = response.ContentType;
string[] pieces = contentType.Split(new string[] { "; boundary=" }, StringSplitOptions.None);
if (pieces.Length < 2)
{
AstoriaTestLog.FailAndThrow(String.Format("Could not retrieve boundary from response's content-type header. Value found was '{0}'", contentType));
}
string boundary = pieces[1].Trim();
// even if content-id is specified, we may not get it back in error cases. This doesn't feel entirely correct, it seems like there should
// always be a 1-1 mapping that explicitly honors content-id's
// TODO: responses / requests without content IDs should be matched up in order within changeset only
// changesets should have the right number of responses too
BatchRequest batchRequest = response.Request as BatchRequest;
List <ResponseFragment> unmatchedFragments = new List <ResponseFragment>();
List <AstoriaRequest> unmatchedRequests = batchRequest.Requests
.Union(batchRequest.Changesets.SelectMany(changeset => changeset.AsEnumerable()))
.ToList();
using (StringReader reader = new StringReader(response.Payload))
{
foreach (ResponseFragment fragment in ParseBatchResponse(reader, boundary))
{
AstoriaRequest request = null;
if (fragment.ContentID != null)
{
request = unmatchedRequests
.FirstOrDefault(r => r.Headers.ContainsKey("Content-ID") &&
r.Headers["Content-ID"].Equals(fragment.ContentID));
}
if (request == null)
{
unmatchedFragments.Add(fragment);
}
else
{
unmatchedRequests.Remove(request);
response.Responses.Add(FragmentToResponse(request, fragment));
}
}
}
if (unmatchedFragments.Any())
{
if (unmatchedFragments.Count < unmatchedRequests.Count)
{
AstoriaTestLog.WriteLine("Warning: recieved fewer batch response fragments than expected");
}
else if (unmatchedFragments.Count > unmatchedRequests.Count)
{
AstoriaTestLog.FailAndThrow("Recieved more batch fragments than expected");
}
for (int i = 0; i < unmatchedFragments.Count; i++)
{
response.Responses.Add(FragmentToResponse(unmatchedRequests[i], unmatchedFragments[i]));
}
}
}
