/// <summary>
/// Encode the length of the packets that are in the data BufferChunk array and place the
/// encoded length over GF16 in the 2 first byte of the checksum packets that are in
/// the result BufferChunk array
/// </summary>
/// <param name="data">The BufferChunk array containing the data packets to get the size</param>
/// <param name="checksum">The number of checksum packets to generate.
/// This number is actually also the number of column of the Vandermonde
/// encoding matrix</param>
/// <param name="encode">The Vandermonde encoding matrix (size min should be
/// Vandermonde #column: checksum, Vandermonde #row: data.Length)
/// </param>
/// <param name="result">The BufferChunk checksum packets array of containing the encoded length (over GF16)
/// in the first 2 bytes</param>
private static void EncodeRSLength(BufferChunk[] data, BufferChunk[] result, UInt16[,] encode)
{
// Get the length once to avoid having the overhead of getting it again inside a inner (performance)
// Note that this value is also used outside of this method, so we could have had a parameter too,
// but I prefer to get it here to avoid inconsistencies
int dataPackets = data.Length;
int checksum = result.Length;
// Note: The size of the Vandermonde matrix used to encode the length is
// Vandermonde #column: checksum, Vandermonde #row: dataPackets
// TODO: Validate if Vandermonde # max column >= checksum and
// Vandermonde #row >= dataPackets
// TODO: Validate that there are no null entries in data and result
// TODO: Validate that all the checksum packet have at least 2 bytes
// Length encoding
for (int encodeColumn = 0; encodeColumn < checksum; encodeColumn++)
{
UInt16 encodeValue = 0;
for (int dataPacket = 0; dataPacket < dataPackets; dataPacket++)
{
// TODO: performance - lengths of BC don't change between loops, store once? JVE
UInt16 dataValue = GF16.Multiply((UInt16)data[dataPacket].Length, encode[encodeColumn, dataPacket]);
encodeValue = GF16.Add(encodeValue, dataValue);
}
result[encodeColumn] += encodeValue;
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Decode to retrieve the missing data packet(s) (null entries) in the data BufferChunk array and place the
/// decoded result over GF16 in order in the recovery BufferChunk array
/// </summary>
/// <param name="data">The data BufferChunk array</param>
/// <param name="checksum">The number of checksum packet(s) that were used to encode</param>
/// <param name="decode">The decoding GF16 matrix</param>
/// <param name="recovery">The recovery BufferChunk array to place the recovered result</param>
private static void DecodeRSData(BufferChunk[] data, int checksum, GF16[,] decode, BufferChunk[] recovery)
{
// Important! For now I assume the following in the firstMatrix:
// - The array is always of size data + checksum
// - #checksum not null entries = #packet lost
// - recovery.length is exactly the number of data packet lost
// - checksum param is # checksum packets that were used to encode
// Reconstruct data
// Get the length once to avoid having the overhead of getting it again inside a inner (performance)
// Note that this value is also used outside of this method, so we could have had a parameter too,
// but I prefer to get it here to avoid inconsitencies
int dataLength = data.Length;
// Scan column after column
int recoveryColumn = 0;
for (int dataColumn = 0; dataColumn < dataLength - checksum; dataColumn++)
{
// recover only the missing column
if (data[dataColumn] == null)
{
int recoveryRowLength = recovery[recoveryColumn].Length;
// For each column fill out the output mtx row after row
for (int recoveryRow = 0; recoveryRow < recoveryRowLength; recoveryRow += 2)
{
int imRowIndex = 0;
// nnDataColumn - not null data index
for (int nnDataColumn = 0; nnDataColumn < dataLength; nnDataColumn++)
{
// Perform the core operation mult with add in GF16
// TODO: We could crunch the column so we avoid this test
if (data[nnDataColumn] != null)
{
if (recoveryRow < data[nnDataColumn].Length)
{
UInt16 currentValue = GF16.Multiply(data[nnDataColumn].GetUInt16(recoveryRow),
decode[dataColumn, imRowIndex].Value);
currentValue = GF16.Add(recovery[recoveryColumn].GetUInt16(recoveryRow), currentValue);
recovery[recoveryColumn].SetUInt16(recoveryRow, currentValue);
}
imRowIndex++;
}
}
}
recoveryColumn++;
}
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Encode the packets that are in the data BufferChunk array and place the
/// encoded result over GF16 in the checksum packets that are in
/// the result BufferChunk array
/// </summary>
/// <param name="data">The BufferChunk array containing the data packets</param>
/// <param name="checksum">The number of checksum packets to generate.
/// This number is actually also the number of column of the Vandermonde
/// encoding matrix</param>
/// <param name="checksum">The BufferChunk checksum packets array of containing the encoded data (over GF16)
/// after the first 2 bytes (the first 2 bytes are used to encode the length)</param>
/// <param name="encode">The Vandermonde encoding matrix (size min should be
/// Vandermonde #column: checksum, Vandermonde #row: data.Length)
/// </param>
/// <param name="checksumRowsInt16">The number of row (in int 16 chunks) of the checksum packets</param>
private static void EncodeRSData(BufferChunk[] data, BufferChunk[] checksum, UInt16[,] encode, int maxDataLength)
{
// Note: The size of the Vandermonde matrix used to encode the length is
// Vandermonde #column: checksumLength, Vandermonde #row: dataPackets
// TODO: Validate if Vandermonde # max column >= checksum and
// Vandermonde #row >= dataPackets
// TODO: Validate that there are no null entries in data and checksum
// Get the length once to avoid having the overhead of getting it again inside a inner (performance)
int dataPackets = data.Length;
int checksumLength = checksum.Length;
// Note that we scan column after column, so we generate the checksum packets
// one after the other
for (int checksumColumn = 0; checksumColumn < checksumLength; checksumColumn++)
{
// For each column fill out the checksum mtx row after row
for (int checksumRow = 0; checksumRow < maxDataLength; checksumRow += 2)
{
for (int encodeRow = 0; encodeRow < dataPackets; encodeRow++)
{
// If we pass the size of the current data packet, so no operation are required
//
if ((checksumRow) < data[encodeRow].Length)
{
UInt16 currentValue = GF16.Multiply(data[encodeRow].GetUInt16(checksumRow),
encode[checksumColumn, encodeRow]);
currentValue = GF16.Add(checksum[checksumColumn].GetUInt16(checksumRow), currentValue);
checksum[checksumColumn].SetUInt16(checksumRow, currentValue);
}
}
}
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Decode to retrieve the length of the missing data packet(s) (null entries) in the
/// data BufferChunk array and set the length of the packets in the recovery BufferChunk array.
/// We have to do that because every data packet could have a different length.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="data">The data BufferChunk array</param>
/// <param name="checksum">The number of checksum packet(s) that were used to encode</param>
/// <param name="decode">The decoding GF16 matrix</param>
/// <param name="recovery">The recovery BufferChunk array to set the length of the recovered packets</param>
private static void DecodeRSLength(BufferChunk[] data, int checksum, GF16[,] decode, BufferChunk[] recovery)
{
// Important! For now I assume the following in the firstMatrix:
// - The array is always of size data + checksum
// - #checksum not null entries = #packet lost
// - recovery.length is exactly the number of data packet lost
// - checksum param is # checksum packets that were used to encode
// Get the length once to avoid having the overhead of getting it again inside a inner (performance)
// Note that this value is also used outside of this method, so we could have had a parameter too,
// but I prefer to get it here to avoid inconsitencies
int dataLength = data.Length;
int recoveryColumn = 0;
for (int dataColumn = 0; dataColumn < dataLength - checksum; dataColumn++)
{
// recover only the missing column
if (data[dataColumn] == null)
{
// Inverted matrix row index
int imRowIndex = 0;
// length of the recovered buffer
UInt16 currentLength = 0;
for (int dataIndex = 0; dataIndex < dataLength; dataIndex++)
{
// Perform the core operation mult with add in GF16
// TODO: We could crunch the column so we avoid this test
if (data[dataIndex] != null)
{
UInt16 length = 0;
if (dataIndex < dataLength - checksum) // For the data part, we get the length of the BufferChunk
{
length = (UInt16)data[dataIndex].Length;
}
else // For the checksum part, the encoded length is inside the first 2 bytes
{
length = data[dataIndex].GetUInt16(0);
}
UInt16 currentValue = GF16.Multiply(length, decode[dataColumn, imRowIndex].Value);
currentLength = GF16.Add(currentLength, currentValue);
imRowIndex++;
} // if
} // for column (do elementary operations)
BufferChunk bc = recovery[recoveryColumn];
bc.Reset(bc.Index, currentLength);
// Reset all of the recovery packets so they have no data
// TODO - Temporary workaround for column based approach - JVE 7/6/2004
bc.Clear();
recoveryColumn++;
} // if
} // for dataColumn
}
/// <summary>
/// Overload the - operator
/// </summary>
/// <param name="a">First operande</param>
/// <param name="b">Second operande</param>
/// <remarks>
/// The subtraction is the same as the addition
/// because with Galois fields, each number is its
/// own negative. So there is no need to have a Sub
/// method
/// </remarks>
/// <returns>Subrtraction of the 2 Galois Fields (XOR)</returns>
public static GF16 operator -(GF16 a, GF16 b)
{
return(GF16.Add(a.Value, b.Value));
}