public InternalActorRef ActorOf(ActorSystemImpl system, Props props, InternalActorRef supervisor, ActorPath path, bool systemService, Deploy deploy, bool lookupDeploy, bool async)
{
//TODO: This does not match Akka's ActorOf at all
Deploy configDeploy = _system.Provider.Deployer.Lookup(path);
deploy = configDeploy ?? props.Deploy ?? Deploy.None;
if (deploy.Mailbox != Deploy.NoMailboxGiven)
{
props = props.WithMailbox(deploy.Mailbox);
}
if (deploy.Dispatcher != Deploy.NoDispatcherGiven)
{
props = props.WithDispatcher(deploy.Dispatcher);
}
//TODO: how should this be dealt with?
//akka simply passes the "deploy" var from remote daemon to ActorOf
//so it atleast seems like they ignore if remote scope is provided here.
//leaving this for now since it does work
if (props.RouterConfig.NoRouter())
{
return(CreateNoRouter(system, props, supervisor, path, deploy, async));
}
return(CreateWithRouter(system, props, supervisor, path, deploy, async));
}
/// <summary>
/// Actors the of.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="system">The system.</param>
/// <param name="props">The props.</param>
/// <param name="supervisor">The supervisor.</param>
/// <param name="path">The path.</param>
/// <param name="systemService">Is this a child actor under the system guardian?</param>
/// <returns>InternalActorRef.</returns>
public override InternalActorRef ActorOf(ActorSystem system, Props props, InternalActorRef supervisor,
ActorPath path, bool systemService = false)
{
ActorCell cell = null;
Mailbox mailbox = System.Mailboxes.FromConfig(props.Mailbox);
Deploy configDeploy = System.Provider.Deployer.Lookup(path);
var deploy = configDeploy ?? props.Deploy ?? Deploy.None;
if (deploy.Mailbox != null)
{
props = props.WithMailbox(deploy.Mailbox);
}
if (deploy.Dispatcher != null)
{
props = props.WithDispatcher(deploy.Dispatcher);
}
if (deploy.Scope is RemoteScope)
{
}
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(props.Mailbox))
{
// throw new NotSupportedException("Mailbox can not be configured as null or empty");
}
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(props.Dispatcher))
{
//TODO: fix this..
// throw new NotSupportedException("Dispatcher can not be configured as null or empty");
}
if (props.Deploy != null && props.Deploy.Scope is RemoteScope)
{
throw new NotSupportedException("LocalActorRefProvider can not deploy remote");
}
if (props.RouterConfig is NoRouter || props.RouterConfig == null)
{
props = props.WithDeploy(deploy);
cell = new ActorCell(system, supervisor, props, path, mailbox);
}
else
{
//if no Router config value was specified, override with procedural input
if (deploy.RouterConfig is NoRouter)
{
deploy = deploy.WithRouterConfig(props.RouterConfig);
}
//TODO: make this work for remote actor ref provider
cell = NewRouterCell(system, supervisor, path, props, mailbox, deploy);
}
cell.NewActor();
// parentContext.Watch(cell.Self);
return(cell.Self);
}
public InternalActorRef ActorOf(ActorSystemImpl system, Props props, InternalActorRef supervisor, ActorPath path, bool systemService, Deploy deploy, bool lookupDeploy, bool async)
{
//TODO: This does not match Akka's ActorOf at all
Deploy configDeploy = _system.Provider.Deployer.Lookup(path);
deploy = configDeploy ?? props.Deploy ?? Deploy.None;
if (deploy.Mailbox != null)
{
props = props.WithMailbox(deploy.Mailbox);
}
if (deploy.Dispatcher != null)
{
props = props.WithDispatcher(deploy.Dispatcher);
}
if (deploy.Scope is RemoteScope)
{
}
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(props.Mailbox))
{
// throw new NotSupportedException("Mailbox can not be configured as null or empty");
}
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(props.Dispatcher))
{
//TODO: fix this..
// throw new NotSupportedException("Dispatcher can not be configured as null or empty");
}
//TODO: how should this be dealt with?
//akka simply passes the "deploy" var from remote daemon to ActorOf
//so it atleast seems like they ignore if remote scope is provided here.
//leaving this for now since it does work
//if (props.Deploy != null && props.Deploy.Scope is RemoteScope)
//{
// throw new NotSupportedException("LocalActorRefProvider can not deploy remote");
//}
if (props.RouterConfig is NoRouter || props.RouterConfig == null)
{
props = props.WithDeploy(deploy);
var dispatcher = system.Dispatchers.FromConfig(props.Dispatcher);
var mailbox = _system.Mailboxes.FromConfig(props.Mailbox);
//TODO: Should be: system.mailboxes.getMailboxType(props2, dispatcher.configurator.config)
if (async)
{
var reActorRef = new RepointableActorRef(system, props, dispatcher, () => mailbox, supervisor, path);
reActorRef.Initialize(async: true);
return(reActorRef);
}
return(new LocalActorRef(system, props, dispatcher, () => mailbox, supervisor, path));
}
else
{
//if no Router config value was specified, override with procedural input
if (deploy.RouterConfig is NoRouter)
{
deploy = deploy.WithRouterConfig(props.RouterConfig);
}
var routerDispatcher = system.Dispatchers.FromConfig(props.RouterConfig.RouterDispatcher);
var routerMailbox = _system.Mailboxes.FromConfig(props.Mailbox);
//TODO: Should be val routerMailbox = system.mailboxes.getMailboxType(routerProps, routerDispatcher.configurator.config)
// routers use context.actorOf() to create the routees, which does not allow us to pass
// these through, but obtain them here for early verification
var routerProps = Props.Empty.WithDeploy(deploy);
var routeeProps = props.WithRouter(RouterConfig.NoRouter);
var routedActorRef = new RoutedActorRef(system, routerProps, routerDispatcher, () => routerMailbox, routeeProps, supervisor, path);
routedActorRef.Initialize(async);
return(routedActorRef);
}
}
