/// <nodoc />
public static Xldb.Proto.ReportedFileAccess ToReportedFileAccess(this ReportedFileAccess reportedFileAccess, PathTable pathTable, NameExpander nameExpander)
{
return(new Xldb.Proto.ReportedFileAccess()
{
// No need to + 1 here since the Bxl version of the enum never conained a 0 value, so adding Unspecified=0 did not change the bxl->protobuf enum mapping
CreationDisposition = (Xldb.Proto.CreationDisposition)reportedFileAccess.CreationDisposition,
// No need to + 1 here since the Bxl version of the enum never conained a 0 value, so adding Unspecified=0 did not change the bxl->protobuf enum mapping
// However, GENERIC_READ is of value 2^31 in bxl code, but -2^31 in protobuf enum due to 2^31 - 1 being the maximum value of an enum in protobuf. Thus special ternary assignment here.
DesiredAccess = reportedFileAccess.DesiredAccess == Processes.DesiredAccess.GENERIC_READ ? Xldb.Proto.DesiredAccess.GenericRead : (Xldb.Proto.DesiredAccess)reportedFileAccess.DesiredAccess,
Error = reportedFileAccess.Error,
Usn = reportedFileAccess.Usn.Value,
// No need to + 1 here since the Bxl version of the enum never conained a 0 value, so adding Unspecified=0 did not change the bxl->protobuf enum mapping
// However, WRITE_THROUGH is of value 2^31 in bxl code, but -2^31 in protobuf enum due to 2^31 - 1 being the maximum value of an enum in protobuf. Thus special ternary assignment here.
FlagsAndAttributes = reportedFileAccess.FlagsAndAttributes == Processes.FlagsAndAttributes.FILE_FLAG_WRITE_THROUGH ? Xldb.Proto.FlagsAndAttributes.FileFlagWriteThrough : (Xldb.Proto.FlagsAndAttributes)reportedFileAccess.FlagsAndAttributes,
Path = reportedFileAccess.Path,
ManifestPath = reportedFileAccess.ManifestPath.ToString(pathTable, PathFormat.Windows, nameExpander),
Process = reportedFileAccess.Process.ToReportedProcess(),
ShareMode = reportedFileAccess.ShareMode == Processes.ShareMode.FILE_SHARE_NONE ? Xldb.Proto.ShareMode.FileShareNone : (Xldb.Proto.ShareMode)((int)reportedFileAccess.ShareMode << 1),
Status = (Xldb.Proto.FileAccessStatus)(reportedFileAccess.Status + 1),
Method = (Xldb.Proto.FileAccessStatusMethod)(reportedFileAccess.Method + 1),
RequestedAccess = reportedFileAccess.RequestedAccess == Processes.RequestedAccess.None ? Xldb.Proto.RequestedAccess.None : (Xldb.Proto.RequestedAccess)((int)reportedFileAccess.RequestedAccess << 1),
Operation = (Xldb.Proto.ReportedFileOperation)(reportedFileAccess.Operation + 1),
ExplicitlyReported = reportedFileAccess.ExplicitlyReported,
EnumeratePattern = reportedFileAccess.EnumeratePattern
});
}
/// <nodoc />
public static Xldb.Proto.ReportedFileAccess ToReportedFileAccess(this ReportedFileAccess reportedFileAccess, PathTable pathTable)
{
return(new Xldb.Proto.ReportedFileAccess()
{
CreationDisposition = (CreationDisposition)reportedFileAccess.CreationDisposition,
DesiredAccess = (DesiredAccess)reportedFileAccess.DesiredAccess,
Error = reportedFileAccess.Error,
Usn = reportedFileAccess.Usn.Value,
FlagsAndAttributes = (FlagsAndAttributes)reportedFileAccess.FlagsAndAttributes,
Path = reportedFileAccess.Path,
ManifestPath = reportedFileAccess.ManifestPath.ToString(pathTable, PathFormat.HostOs),
Process = reportedFileAccess.Process.ToReportedProcess(),
ShareMode = (ShareMode)reportedFileAccess.ShareMode,
Status = (FileAccessStatus)reportedFileAccess.Status,
Method = (FileAccessStatusMethod)reportedFileAccess.Method,
RequestedAccess = (RequestedAccess)reportedFileAccess.RequestedAccess,
Operation = (ReportedFileOperation)reportedFileAccess.Operation,
ExplicitlyReported = reportedFileAccess.ExplicitlyReported,
EnumeratePattern = reportedFileAccess.EnumeratePattern
});
}
/// <nodoc />
public static Xldb.Proto.ReportedFileAccess ToReportedFileAccess(this ReportedFileAccess reportedFileAccess, PathTable pathTable)
{
return(new Xldb.Proto.ReportedFileAccess()
{
// No need to + 1 here since the Bxl version of the enum never conained a 0 value, so adding Invalid=0 did not change the bxl->protobuf enum mapping
CreationDisposition = (CreationDisposition)reportedFileAccess.CreationDisposition,
// No need to + 1 here since the Bxl version of the enum never conained a 0 value, so adding Invalid=0 did not change the bxl->protobuf enum mapping
DesiredAccess = (DesiredAccess)reportedFileAccess.DesiredAccess,
Error = reportedFileAccess.Error,
Usn = reportedFileAccess.Usn.Value,
// No need to + 1 here since the Bxl version of the enum never conained a 0 value, so adding Invalid=0 did not change the bxl->protobuf enum mapping
FlagsAndAttributes = (FlagsAndAttributes)reportedFileAccess.FlagsAndAttributes,
Path = reportedFileAccess.Path,
ManifestPath = reportedFileAccess.ManifestPath.ToString(pathTable, PathFormat.Windows),
Process = reportedFileAccess.Process.ToReportedProcess(),
ShareMode = reportedFileAccess.ShareMode == Processes.ShareMode.FILE_SHARE_NONE ? ShareMode.FileShareNone : (ShareMode)((int)reportedFileAccess.ShareMode << 1),
Status = (FileAccessStatus)(reportedFileAccess.Status + 1),
Method = (FileAccessStatusMethod)(reportedFileAccess.Method + 1),
RequestedAccess = reportedFileAccess.RequestedAccess.ToRequestedAccess(),
Operation = (ReportedFileOperation)(reportedFileAccess.Operation + 1),
ExplicitlyReported = reportedFileAccess.ExplicitlyReported,
EnumeratePattern = reportedFileAccess.EnumeratePattern
});
}