Пример #1
0
        public void InvalidAccessedPathExcludedFromAnalysis()
        {
            BuildXLContext context  = BuildXLContext.CreateInstanceForTesting();
            var            graph    = new QueryablePipDependencyGraph(context);
            var            analyzer = new TestFileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer(LoggingContext, context, graph);

            var declaredOuput = CreateAbsolutePath(context, X("/X/out/declared"));

            var process = graph.AddProcess(declaredOuput);

            var result = analyzer.AnalyzePipViolations(
                process,
                new[]
            {
                CreateViolationForInvalidPath(RequestedAccess.Read, X("c/invalid:name_1.txt"))
            },
                new[]
            {
                CreateViolationForInvalidPath(RequestedAccess.Read, X("c/invalid:name_2.txt"))
            },
                exclusiveOpaqueDirectoryContent: null,
                sharedOpaqueDirectoryWriteAccesses: null,
                allowedUndeclaredReads: null,
                absentPathProbesUnderOutputDirectories: null
                );

            XAssert.IsTrue(result.IsViolationClean);
        }
Пример #2
0
        public void DoubleWriteReportedForPathOrderedBefore()
        {
            BuildXLContext context  = BuildXLContext.CreateInstanceForTesting();
            var            graph    = new QueryablePipDependencyGraph(context);
            var            analyzer = new TestFileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer(LoggingContext, context, graph);

            AbsolutePath violatorOutput = CreateAbsolutePath(context, JunkPath);
            AbsolutePath producerOutput = CreateAbsolutePath(context, DoubleWritePath);

            Process producer = graph.AddProcess(producerOutput);
            Process violator = graph.AddProcess(violatorOutput);

            analyzer.AnalyzePipViolations(
                violator,
                new[] { CreateViolation(RequestedAccess.ReadWrite, producerOutput) },
                new ReportedFileAccess[0],
                exclusiveOpaqueDirectoryContent: null,
                sharedOpaqueDirectoryWriteAccesses: null,
                allowedUndeclaredReads: null,
                absentPathProbesUnderOutputDirectories: null);

            analyzer.AssertContainsViolation(
                new DependencyViolation(
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.DependencyViolationType.DoubleWrite,
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.AccessLevel.Write,
                    producerOutput,
                    violator,
                    producer),
                "The violator is after the producer, so this should be a double-write on the produced path.");
            analyzer.AssertNoExtraViolationsCollected();
            AssertErrorEventLogged(EventId.FileMonitoringError);
        }
Пример #3
0
        public void UndeclaredOutput()
        {
            BuildXLContext context  = BuildXLContext.CreateInstanceForTesting();
            var            graph    = new QueryablePipDependencyGraph(context);
            var            analyzer = new TestFileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer(LoggingContext, context, graph);

            AbsolutePath declaredOutput   = CreateAbsolutePath(context, X("/X/out/produced1"));
            AbsolutePath undeclaredOutput = CreateAbsolutePath(context, X("/X/out/produced2"));
            Process      producer         = graph.AddProcess(declaredOutput);

            analyzer.AnalyzePipViolations(
                producer,
                new[]
            {
                CreateViolation(RequestedAccess.Write, undeclaredOutput),
            },
                new ReportedFileAccess[0],
                exclusiveOpaqueDirectoryContent: null,
                sharedOpaqueDirectoryWriteAccesses: null,
                allowedUndeclaredReads: null,
                absentPathProbesUnderOutputDirectories: null);

            analyzer.AssertContainsViolation(
                new DependencyViolation(
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.DependencyViolationType.UndeclaredOutput,
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.AccessLevel.Write,
                    undeclaredOutput,
                    producer,
                    null),
                "The violator has an undeclared output but it wasn't reported.");
            AssertErrorEventLogged(EventId.FileMonitoringError);
        }
Пример #4
0
        public void UndeclaredReadCycleReportedForPathOrderedAfter()
        {
            BuildXLContext context  = BuildXLContext.CreateInstanceForTesting();
            var            graph    = new QueryablePipDependencyGraph(context);
            var            analyzer = new TestFileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer(LoggingContext, context, graph);

            AbsolutePath violatorOutput = CreateAbsolutePath(context, JunkPath);
            AbsolutePath producerOutput = CreateAbsolutePath(context, ProducedPath);

            Process violator = graph.AddProcess(violatorOutput);
            Process producer = graph.AddProcess(producerOutput);

            analyzer.AnalyzePipViolations(
                violator,
                new[] { CreateViolation(RequestedAccess.Read, producerOutput) },
                new ReportedFileAccess[0],
                exclusiveOpaqueDirectoryContent: null,
                sharedOpaqueDirectoryWriteAccesses: null,
                allowedUndeclaredReads: null,
                absentPathProbesUnderOutputDirectories: null);

            analyzer.AssertContainsViolation(
                new DependencyViolation(
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.DependencyViolationType.UndeclaredReadCycle,
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.AccessLevel.Read,
                    producerOutput,
                    violator,
                    producer),
                "An UndeclaredReadCycle should have been reported since an earlier pip has an undeclared read of a later pip's output.");

            analyzer.AssertNoExtraViolationsCollected();
            AssertErrorEventLogged(EventId.FileMonitoringError);
        }
Пример #5
0
        public void DoubleWriteNotReportedForPathOrderedAfter()
        {
            BuildXLContext context  = BuildXLContext.CreateInstanceForTesting();
            var            graph    = new QueryablePipDependencyGraph(context);
            var            analyzer = new TestFileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer(LoggingContext, context, graph);

            AbsolutePath violatorOutput = CreateAbsolutePath(context, JunkPath);
            AbsolutePath producerOutput = CreateAbsolutePath(context, DoubleWritePath);

            Process violator = graph.AddProcess(violatorOutput);
            Process producer = graph.AddProcess(producerOutput);

            analyzer.AnalyzePipViolations(
                violator,
                new[] { CreateViolation(RequestedAccess.ReadWrite, producerOutput) },
                new ReportedFileAccess[0],
                exclusiveOpaqueDirectoryContent: null,
                sharedOpaqueDirectoryWriteAccesses: null,
                allowedUndeclaredReads: null,
                absentPathProbesUnderOutputDirectories: null,
                ReadOnlyArray <(FileArtifact, FileMaterializationInfo, PipOutputOrigin)> .Empty,
                out _);

            analyzer.AssertContainsViolation(
                new DependencyViolation(
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.DependencyViolationType.UndeclaredOutput,
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.AccessLevel.Write,
                    producerOutput,
                    violator,
                    null),
                "The violator has an undeclared output but it wasn't reported.");

            analyzer.AssertNoExtraViolationsCollected();
            AssertErrorEventLogged(EventId.FileMonitoringError);
        }
Пример #6
0
        public void ReadLevelViolationReportedForUnknownPath()
        {
            BuildXLContext context  = BuildXLContext.CreateInstanceForTesting();
            var            graph    = new QueryablePipDependencyGraph(context);
            var            analyzer = new TestFileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer(LoggingContext, context, graph);

            AbsolutePath unknown  = CreateAbsolutePath(context, X("/X/out/unknown"));
            AbsolutePath produced = CreateAbsolutePath(context, ProducedPath);

            Process process = graph.AddProcess(produced);

            analyzer.AnalyzePipViolations(
                process,
                new[] { CreateViolation(RequestedAccess.Read, unknown) },
                new ReportedFileAccess[0],
                exclusiveOpaqueDirectoryContent: null,
                sharedOpaqueDirectoryWriteAccesses: null,
                allowedUndeclaredReads: null,
                absentPathProbesUnderOutputDirectories: null);

            analyzer.AssertContainsViolation(
                new DependencyViolation(
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.DependencyViolationType.MissingSourceDependency,
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.AccessLevel.Read,
                    unknown,
                    process,
                    null),
                "A MissingSourceDependency should have been reported with no suggested value");

            analyzer.AssertNoExtraViolationsCollected();
            AssertErrorEventLogged(EventId.FileMonitoringError);
        }
Пример #7
0
        public void UndeclaredOrderedReadReportedForPathOrderedBefore()
        {
            BuildXLContext context  = BuildXLContext.CreateInstanceForTesting();
            var            graph    = new QueryablePipDependencyGraph(context);
            var            analyzer = new TestFileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer(LoggingContext, context, graph, true);

            AbsolutePath producerOutput = CreateAbsolutePath(context, ProducedPath);
            AbsolutePath violatorOutput = CreateAbsolutePath(context, JunkPath);

            Process producer = graph.AddProcess(producerOutput);
            Process violator = graph.AddProcess(violatorOutput);

            analyzer.AnalyzePipViolations(
                violator,
                new[] { CreateViolation(RequestedAccess.Read, producerOutput) },
                new ReportedFileAccess[0],
                exclusiveOpaqueDirectoryContent: null,
                sharedOpaqueDirectoryWriteAccesses: null,
                allowedUndeclaredReads: null,
                absentPathProbesUnderOutputDirectories: null,
                ReadOnlyArray <(FileArtifact, FileMaterializationInfo, PipOutputOrigin)> .Empty,
                out _);

            AssertVerboseEventLogged(LogEventId.DependencyViolationUndeclaredOrderedRead);
            AssertErrorEventLogged(EventId.FileMonitoringError);
        }
Пример #8
0
        public void DoubleWritePolicyDeterminesViolationSeverity(DoubleWritePolicy doubleWritePolicy)
        {
            BuildXLContext context  = BuildXLContext.CreateInstanceForTesting();
            var            graph    = new QueryablePipDependencyGraph(context);
            var            analyzer = new TestFileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer(
                LoggingContext,
                context,
                graph,
                // Set this to test the logic of base.HandleDependencyViolation(...) instead of the overriding fake
                doLogging: true,
                collectNonErrorViolations: true);

            AbsolutePath violatorOutput = CreateAbsolutePath(context, JunkPath);
            AbsolutePath producerOutput = CreateAbsolutePath(context, DoubleWritePath);

            Process producer = graph.AddProcess(producerOutput, doubleWritePolicy);
            Process violator = graph.AddProcess(violatorOutput, doubleWritePolicy);

            analyzer.AnalyzePipViolations(
                violator,
                new[] { CreateViolation(RequestedAccess.ReadWrite, producerOutput) },
                new ReportedFileAccess[0],
                exclusiveOpaqueDirectoryContent: null,
                sharedOpaqueDirectoryWriteAccesses: null,
                allowedUndeclaredReads: null,
                absentPathProbesUnderOutputDirectories: null,
                ReadOnlyArray <(FileArtifact, FileMaterializationInfo, PipOutputOrigin)> .Empty,
                out _);

            analyzer.AssertContainsViolation(
                new DependencyViolation(
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.DependencyViolationType.DoubleWrite,
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.AccessLevel.Write,
                    producerOutput,
                    violator,
                    producer),
                "The violator is after the producer, so this should be a double-write on the produced path.");

            analyzer.AssertNoExtraViolationsCollected();
            AssertVerboseEventLogged(LogEventId.DependencyViolationDoubleWrite);

            // Based on the double write policy, the violation is an error or a warning
            if (doubleWritePolicy == DoubleWritePolicy.DoubleWritesAreErrors)
            {
                AssertErrorEventLogged(EventId.FileMonitoringError);
            }
            else
            {
                AssertWarningEventLogged(EventId.FileMonitoringWarning);
            }
        }
Пример #9
0
        public void AggregateLogMessageOnUndeclaredReadWrite()
        {
            BuildXLContext context  = BuildXLContext.CreateInstanceForTesting();
            var            graph    = new QueryablePipDependencyGraph(context);
            var            analyzer = new TestFileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer(LoggingContext, context, graph);

            AbsolutePath declaredOuput       = CreateAbsolutePath(context, X("/X/out/declared"));
            AbsolutePath undeclaredRead      = CreateAbsolutePath(context, X("/X/out/undeclaredR"));
            AbsolutePath undeclaredWrite     = CreateAbsolutePath(context, X("/X/out/undeclaredW"));
            AbsolutePath undeclaredReadWrite = CreateAbsolutePath(context, X("/X/out/undeclaredRW"));

            Process process = graph.AddProcess(declaredOuput);

            analyzer.AnalyzePipViolations(
                process,
                new[]
            {
                CreateViolation(RequestedAccess.Read, undeclaredRead),
                CreateViolation(RequestedAccess.Write, undeclaredWrite),
                CreateViolation(RequestedAccess.Read, undeclaredReadWrite),
                CreateViolation(RequestedAccess.Write, undeclaredReadWrite)
            },
                new ReportedFileAccess[0],
                exclusiveOpaqueDirectoryContent: null,
                sharedOpaqueDirectoryWriteAccesses: null,
                allowedUndeclaredReads: null,
                absentPathProbesUnderOutputDirectories: null,
                ReadOnlyArray <(FileArtifact, FileMaterializationInfo, PipOutputOrigin)> .Empty,
                out _);

            AssertErrorEventLogged(EventId.FileMonitoringError);

            // The ending of the expected log message.
            // The order of files here is based on the sorting in FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.AggregateAccessViolationPaths()
            StringBuilder expectedLog = new StringBuilder();

            expectedLog.AppendLine("- Disallowed file accesses were detected (R = read, W = write):");
            // process that 'caused' the violations
            expectedLog.AppendLine($"Disallowed file accesses performed by: {ReportedExecutablePath}");
            // aggregated paths
            expectedLog.AppendLine(ReportedFileAccess.ReadDescriptionPrefix + undeclaredRead.ToString(context.PathTable));
            expectedLog.AppendLine(ReportedFileAccess.WriteDescriptionPrefix + undeclaredReadWrite.ToString(context.PathTable));
            expectedLog.AppendLine(ReportedFileAccess.WriteDescriptionPrefix + undeclaredWrite.ToString(context.PathTable));

            var eventLog = OperatingSystemHelper.IsUnixOS ? EventListener.GetLog().Replace("\r", "") : EventListener.GetLog();

            XAssert.IsTrue(eventLog.EndsWith(expectedLog.ToString()));
        }
Пример #10
0
        public void DoubleWritePolicyIsContentAware(DoubleWritePolicy doubleWritePolicy)
        {
            BuildXLContext context  = BuildXLContext.CreateInstanceForTesting();
            var            graph    = new QueryablePipDependencyGraph(context);
            var            analyzer = new TestFileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer(
                LoggingContext,
                context,
                graph,
                // Set this to test the logic of base.HandleDependencyViolation(...) instead of the overriding fake
                doLogging: true,
                collectNonErrorViolations: true);

            // Create the path where the double write will occur, and a random file content that will be used for both producers
            AbsolutePath doubleWriteOutput = CreateAbsolutePath(context, JunkPath);
            ContentHash  contentHash       = ContentHashingUtilities.CreateRandom();
            var          fileContentInfo   = new FileContentInfo(contentHash, contentHash.Length);
            var          outputsContent    = new (FileArtifact, FileMaterializationInfo, PipOutputOrigin)[]
Пример #11
0
        public void ReadRaceReportedForConcurrentPath()
        {
            BuildXLContext context  = BuildXLContext.CreateInstanceForTesting();
            var            graph    = new QueryablePipDependencyGraph(context);
            var            analyzer = new TestFileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer(LoggingContext, context, graph);

            AbsolutePath violatorOutput = CreateAbsolutePath(context, JunkPath);
            AbsolutePath producerOutput = CreateAbsolutePath(context, ProducedPath);

            Process producer = graph.AddProcess(producerOutput);
            Process violator = graph.AddProcess(violatorOutput);

            graph.SetConcurrentRange(producer, violator);

            analyzer.AnalyzePipViolations(
                violator,
                new[] { CreateViolation(RequestedAccess.Read, producerOutput) },
                new ReportedFileAccess[0],
                exclusiveOpaqueDirectoryContent: null,
                sharedOpaqueDirectoryWriteAccesses: null,
                allowedUndeclaredReads: null,
                absentPathProbesUnderOutputDirectories: null,
                ReadOnlyArray <(FileArtifact, FileMaterializationInfo, PipOutputOrigin)> .Empty,
                out _);

            analyzer.AssertContainsViolation(
                new DependencyViolation(
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.DependencyViolationType.ReadRace,
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.AccessLevel.Read,
                    producerOutput,
                    violator,
                    producer),
                "The violator is concurrent with the producer, so this should be a read-race on the produced path.");
            analyzer.AssertNoExtraViolationsCollected();
            AssertErrorEventLogged(EventId.FileMonitoringError);
        }
Пример #12
0
        public void ReadUndeclaredOutput()
        {
            BuildXLContext context  = BuildXLContext.CreateInstanceForTesting();
            var            graph    = new QueryablePipDependencyGraph(context);
            var            analyzer = new TestFileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer(LoggingContext, context, graph, true);

            AbsolutePath producerOutput   = CreateAbsolutePath(context, ProducedPath);
            AbsolutePath undeclaredOutput = CreateAbsolutePath(context, X("/X/out/produced2"));
            AbsolutePath consumerOutput   = CreateAbsolutePath(context, JunkPath);
            AbsolutePath consumerOutput2  = CreateAbsolutePath(context, X("/X/out/junk2"));

            Process producerViolator  = graph.AddProcess(producerOutput);
            Process consumerViolator  = graph.AddProcess(consumerOutput);
            Process consumerViolator2 = graph.AddProcess(consumerOutput2);

            analyzer.AnalyzePipViolations(
                consumerViolator,
                new[]
            {
                CreateViolation(RequestedAccess.Read, undeclaredOutput),
            },
                new ReportedFileAccess[0],
                exclusiveOpaqueDirectoryContent: null,
                sharedOpaqueDirectoryWriteAccesses: null,
                allowedUndeclaredReads: null,
                absentPathProbesUnderOutputDirectories: null);

            analyzer.AnalyzePipViolations(
                producerViolator,
                new[]
            {
                CreateViolation(RequestedAccess.Write, undeclaredOutput),
            },
                new ReportedFileAccess[0],
                exclusiveOpaqueDirectoryContent: null,
                sharedOpaqueDirectoryWriteAccesses: null,
                allowedUndeclaredReads: null,
                absentPathProbesUnderOutputDirectories: null);

            analyzer.AnalyzePipViolations(
                consumerViolator2,
                new[]
            {
                CreateViolation(RequestedAccess.Read, undeclaredOutput)
            },
                new ReportedFileAccess[0],
                exclusiveOpaqueDirectoryContent: null,
                sharedOpaqueDirectoryWriteAccesses: null,
                allowedUndeclaredReads: null,
                absentPathProbesUnderOutputDirectories: null);

            analyzer.AssertContainsViolation(
                new DependencyViolation(
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.DependencyViolationType.UndeclaredOutput,
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.AccessLevel.Write,
                    undeclaredOutput,
                    producerViolator,
                    null),
                "The violator has wrote undeclared output but it wasn't reported.");

            analyzer.AssertContainsViolation(
                new DependencyViolation(
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.DependencyViolationType.ReadUndeclaredOutput,
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.AccessLevel.Read,
                    undeclaredOutput,
                    consumerViolator2,
                    producerViolator),
                "The violator read an undeclared output but it wasn't reported as ReadUndeclaredOutput.");

            analyzer.AssertContainsViolation(
                new DependencyViolation(
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.DependencyViolationType.MissingSourceDependency,
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.AccessLevel.Read,
                    undeclaredOutput,
                    consumerViolator2,
                    null),
                "The violator read an undeclared output but it wasn't reported as MissingSourceDependency.");

            analyzer.AssertContainsViolation(
                new DependencyViolation(
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.DependencyViolationType.ReadUndeclaredOutput,
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.AccessLevel.Read,
                    undeclaredOutput,
                    consumerViolator,
                    producerViolator),
                "The violator read an undeclared output but it wasn't reported as ReadUndeclaredOutput.");

            analyzer.AssertContainsViolation(
                new DependencyViolation(
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.DependencyViolationType.MissingSourceDependency,
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.AccessLevel.Read,
                    undeclaredOutput,
                    consumerViolator,
                    null),
                "The violator read an undeclared output but it wasn't reported as MissingSourceDependency.");

            AssertVerboseEventLogged(LogEventId.DependencyViolationReadUndeclaredOutput, 2);
            AssertVerboseEventLogged(LogEventId.DependencyViolationUndeclaredOutput);
            AssertVerboseEventLogged(LogEventId.DependencyViolationMissingSourceDependency, 2);
            AssertErrorEventLogged(EventId.FileMonitoringError, 3);
        }
Пример #13
0
        public void MultipleViolationsReportedForSinglePip()
        {
            BuildXLContext context  = BuildXLContext.CreateInstanceForTesting();
            var            graph    = new QueryablePipDependencyGraph(context);
            var            analyzer = new TestFileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer(LoggingContext, context, graph);

            AbsolutePath produced1 = CreateAbsolutePath(context, X("/X/out/produced1"));
            AbsolutePath produced2 = CreateAbsolutePath(context, X("/X/out/produced2"));
            AbsolutePath produced3 = CreateAbsolutePath(context, X("/X/out/produced3"));

            Process producer1 = graph.AddProcess(produced1);
            Process producer2 = graph.AddProcess(produced2);
            Process producer3 = graph.AddProcess(produced3);
            Process violator  = graph.AddProcess(CreateAbsolutePath(context, X("/X/out/violator")));

            graph.SetConcurrentRange(producer3, violator);

            analyzer.AnalyzePipViolations(
                violator,
                new[]
            {
                CreateViolation(RequestedAccess.Read, produced3),
                CreateViolation(RequestedAccess.Read, produced2),
                CreateViolation(RequestedAccess.Write, produced1),
            },
                new ReportedFileAccess[0],
                exclusiveOpaqueDirectoryContent: null,
                sharedOpaqueDirectoryWriteAccesses: null,
                allowedUndeclaredReads: null,
                absentPathProbesUnderOutputDirectories: null);

            analyzer.AssertContainsViolation(
                new DependencyViolation(
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.DependencyViolationType.ReadRace,
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.AccessLevel.Read,
                    produced3,
                    violator,
                    producer3),
                "The violator is concurrent with the producer, so this should be a read-race on the produced path.");

            analyzer.AssertContainsViolation(
                new DependencyViolation(
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.DependencyViolationType.UndeclaredOrderedRead,
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.AccessLevel.Read,
                    produced2,
                    violator,
                    producer2),
                "The violator has an undeclared read on the producer but it wasn't reported.");

            analyzer.AssertContainsViolation(
                new DependencyViolation(
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.DependencyViolationType.DoubleWrite,
                    FileMonitoringViolationAnalyzer.AccessLevel.Write,
                    produced1,
                    violator,
                    producer1),
                "The violator is after the producer, so this should be a double-write on the produced path.");

            analyzer.AssertNoExtraViolationsCollected();
            AssertErrorEventLogged(EventId.FileMonitoringError);
        }