public void Run2()
{
var nums = Enumerable.Range(0, 10000000).ToArray();
// 開啟負載平衡，告訴PLINQ要使用區塊分割。
Partitioner <int> customPartitioner = Partitioner.Create(nums, true);
long startTime = DateTime.Now.Ticks; //Nanosecond
var q = (from x in customPartitioner.AsParallel()
select x *Math.PI).ToArray();
long endTime = DateTime.Now.Ticks; //Nanosecond
Console.WriteLine("Time1 : " + (endTime - startTime).ToString());
//From what I understand, PLINQ will choose range or chunk partitioning depending on whether
//the source sequence is an IList or not. If it is an IList, the bounds are known and elements
//can be accessed by index, so PLINQ chooses range partitioning to divide the list evenly
//between threads. For instance, if you have 1000 items in your list and you use 4 threads,
//each thread will have 250 items to process. On the other hand, if the source sequence
//is not an IList, PLINQ can't use range partitioning because it doesn't know what the
//ranges would be; so it uses chunk partitioning instead.
//In your case, if you have an IList and you want to force chunk partitioning, you
//can just make it look like a simple IEnumerable: instead of writing this:
}
public static int MaxPlinqPartitioned(this int[] source)
{
// Create a load-balancing partitioner. Or specify false for static partitioning.
Partitioner <int> customPartitioner = Partitioner.Create(source, true);
return(customPartitioner.AsParallel().Max());
}
internal static void ChunkPartitioningForPartitioner()
{
const int ChunkRepeatCount = 3;
Partitioner <int> partitioner = Partitioner.Create(
Enumerable.Range(0, (1 + 2) * ChunkRepeatCount * Environment.ProcessorCount + 4));
partitioner.AsParallel()
.Visualize(ParallelEnumerable.Select, value => value + ComputingWorkload())
.WriteLines();
}
private static void ParseLogsParallel(Partitioner <string> logsPartitioner, out ConcurrentBag <string> stackTraces, out long workingTime)
{
var parallelTimer = Stopwatch.StartNew();
var parallelStackTraces = new ConcurrentBag <string>();
logsPartitioner.AsParallel()
.ForAll(line => ProcessLine(line, ref parallelStackTraces));
stackTraces = parallelStackTraces;
workingTime = parallelTimer.ElapsedMilliseconds;
}
static void ParallelLoopsWithPartitioner()
{
//<snippet02>
// Static partitioning requires indexable source. Load balancing
// can use any IEnumerable.
var nums = Enumerable.Range(0, 100000000).ToArray();
// Create a load-balancing partitioner. Or specify false for static partitioning.
Partitioner <int> customPartitioner = Partitioner.Create(nums, true);
// The partitioner is the query's data source.
var q = from x in customPartitioner.AsParallel()
select x *Math.PI;
q.ForAll((x) =>
{
ProcessData(x);
});
//</snippet02>
Stopwatch sw = Stopwatch.StartNew();
// Must be load balanced partitioner
// for this simple data source.
// Partitioner<int> p = Partitioner.Create(nums, true);
Parallel.ForEach(customPartitioner, (x) =>
{
double d = (double)x * Math.PI;
}
);
Console.WriteLine("elapsed for Parallel.For: {0}", sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);
sw = Stopwatch.StartNew();
customPartitioner = Partitioner.Create(nums, true);
var q7 = from x in customPartitioner.AsParallel()
select x;// *Math.PI;
q7.ForAll((x) =>
{
double d = (double)x * Math.PI;
});
Console.WriteLine("elapsed for PLINQ with load-balancing: {0}", sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);
// Console.WriteLine("Clearing memory cache");
//for (int i = 0; i < arr.Length; i++)
// arr[i] = Math.PI;
sw = Stopwatch.StartNew();
customPartitioner = Partitioner.Create(nums, false);
var q2 = from x in customPartitioner.AsParallel()
select x;// *Math.PI;
q2.ForAll((x) =>
{
double d = (double)x * Math.PI;
});
Console.WriteLine("elapsed for PLINQ without load-balancing: {0}", sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);
}