public StateAspect this[StateAspect comparisonState]
{
get
{
if (comparisonState.stateType == StateAspect.StateType.Authority)
{
return(authority);
}
else if (comparisonState.stateType == StateAspect.StateType.Suspicion)
{
return(suspicion);
}
else
{
return(alert);
}
}
set
{
if (comparisonState.stateType == StateAspect.StateType.Authority)
{
authority = value;
}
else if (comparisonState.stateType == StateAspect.StateType.Suspicion)
{
suspicion = value;
}
else
{
alert = value;
}
}
}
// The above are actually 'topologically' equivalent - both serve as a repository of named flags, specific to this run, which start out false
// but could become true as the result of the hacking run. Stuff like paydata, cameras-spoofed, or voiceprint-acquired. The only
// real difference is conceptual, for the simplicity of GMs and so forth, and some small difference if you want to know if *all*
// of the objectives have been met (ditto 'at least one' and so forth).
public HackingAttemptState()
{
authority = Authority.AuthPrompt;
suspicion = Suspicion.None;
alert = Alert.None;
Objectives = new Dictionary <string, bool>();
Conditions = new Dictionary <string, bool>();
}
public IfStateIs(StateAspect benchmark, StateChangeCriterion criterion)
{
Benchmark = benchmark;
Criterion = criterion;
}
public ActionOpportunity IfStateIs(StateAspect benchmark, StateChangeCriterion criterion)
{
Criterion = new OpportunityCriteria.IfStateIs(benchmark, criterion); return(this);
}
public StateChange(StateAspect changeTo, StateChangeCriterion constraint = null)
{
ChangeTo = changeTo;
Constraint = constraint ?? StandardCriteria.ifPossible;
}