public void Link_TwoParentsTest()
{
// Legend: x->y (y is a parent of x)
// T1: Source: c->b->a
// T2: Sync
// T3: Target: c->b->a
// T4: Source: delete c->b, add a->c ==> b->a->c
// Target: delete b->a, add a->b ==> a->b, c->b (b has two children)
// T5: Sync
// add a work item on source side
int sourceIdA = SourceAdapter.AddWorkItem("Bug", "A", "A");
int sourceIdB = SourceAdapter.AddWorkItem("Bug", "B", "B");
int sourceIdC = SourceAdapter.AddWorkItem("Bug", "C", "C");
RunAndNoValidate();
// T1-T3: c->b->a
TfsSourceAdapter.AddParentChildLink(sourceIdB, sourceIdC);
TfsSourceAdapter.AddParentChildLink(sourceIdA, sourceIdB);
RunAndNoValidate(true);
// T4:
// Source: delete c->b, add a->c ==> b->a->c (a is the child of c)
TfsSourceAdapter.DeleteParentChildLink(sourceIdB, sourceIdC);
TfsSourceAdapter.AddParentChildLink(sourceIdC, sourceIdA);
// Target: delete b->a, add a->b ==> a->b, c->b (a is the child of b)
int targetId1 = QueryTargetWorkItemID(sourceIdA);
int targetId2 = QueryTargetWorkItemID(sourceIdB);
int targetIdC = QueryTargetWorkItemID(sourceIdC);
TfsTargetAdapter.DeleteParentChildLink(targetId1, targetId2);
TfsTargetAdapter.AddParentChildLink(targetId2, targetId1);
// after sync:
// source: b->a->c
// target: a->b (adding a->c is conflicted)
RunAndNoValidate(true);
// verify the expected conflict
ConflictResolver conflictResolver = new ConflictResolver(Configuration);
List <RTConflict> conflicts = conflictResolver.GetConflicts();
Guid TFSMulitpleParentLinkConflictTypeReferenceName = new Guid("ADCE870C-33C0-46bc-9350-31660A463F9A");
// Workaround for Bug 529648: Accept 1 or more conflicts. We should only generate 1 conflict, but for Two-way scenarios we generate 2.
Assert.IsTrue(conflicts.Count > 0, "There should be 1 or more conflicts");
foreach (RTConflict conflict in conflicts)
{
Assert.IsTrue(TFSMulitpleParentLinkConflictTypeReferenceName.Equals(conflict.ConflictTypeReference.Value.ReferenceName),
"It should be a TFSMultipleParentLinkConflict");
}
// fix the hierarchy on target, delete a->b
// target: a, b, c
TfsTargetAdapter.DeleteParentChildLink(targetId2, targetId1);
foreach (RTConflict conflict in conflicts)
{
// resolve the conflict(s) by taking source side changes
conflictResolver.TryResolveConflict(conflict, new ManualConflictResolutionAction(), "/");
}
// restart the migration tool, after sync
// source: b->a->c
// target: a->c
RunAndNoValidate(true);
conflicts = conflictResolver.GetConflicts();
if (TestEnvironment.MigrationTestType == MigrationTestType.OneWay)
{
Assert.IsTrue(conflicts.Count == 0, "There should be no conflict");
// One way migration should have source/target out of sync
Assert.AreEqual(2, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(sourceIdA));
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(sourceIdB));
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(sourceIdC));
}
else
{
// In two-way case, add a->b on Target at T4 above causes multi-parent conflict
// when migrated back to source because a->c already exists on source.
Assert.IsTrue(conflicts.Count == 1, "There should be one conflict");
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(sourceIdA));
Assert.AreEqual(0, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(sourceIdB));
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(sourceIdC));
}
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsTargetAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(targetId1));
Assert.AreEqual(0, TfsTargetAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(targetId2));
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsTargetAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(targetIdC));
}
public void Link_CyclicLinkTest()
{
// Legend: x->y (y is a parent of x)
// T1: Source: a->b->c d
// T2: Sync
// T3: Target: a->b->c d
// T4: Source: delete b->c, add c->a ==> a->b c->a d
// Target: delete b->c, add b->d , d->c ==> a->b->d->c
// T5: Sync
// We should detect cyclic link and raise a conflict
// add a work item on source side
int sourceIdA = SourceAdapter.AddWorkItem("Bug", "A", "A");
int sourceIdB = SourceAdapter.AddWorkItem("Bug", "B", "B");
int sourceIdC = SourceAdapter.AddWorkItem("Bug", "C", "C");
int sourceIdD = SourceAdapter.AddWorkItem("Bug", "D", "D");
RunAndNoValidate();
// add b->c
TfsSourceAdapter.AddParentChildLink(sourceIdC, sourceIdB);
// add a->b
TfsSourceAdapter.AddParentChildLink(sourceIdB, sourceIdA);
// after sync,
// Source: a->b->c d
// Target: a->b->c d
RunAndNoValidate(true);
int targetIdA = QueryTargetWorkItemID(sourceIdA);
int targetIdB = QueryTargetWorkItemID(sourceIdB);
int targetIdC = QueryTargetWorkItemID(sourceIdC);
int targetIdD = QueryTargetWorkItemID(sourceIdD);
// Source: delete b->c, add c->a, now source is c->a->b d
TfsSourceAdapter.DeleteParentChildLink(sourceIdC, sourceIdB);
TfsSourceAdapter.AddParentChildLink(sourceIdA, sourceIdC);
// Target: delete b->c, add b->d , d->c, now target is a->b->d->c
TfsTargetAdapter.DeleteParentChildLink(targetIdC, targetIdB);
TfsTargetAdapter.AddParentChildLink(targetIdD, targetIdB);
TfsTargetAdapter.AddParentChildLink(targetIdC, targetIdD);
// c->a from source will create cyclic link on target
RunAndNoValidate(true);
// verify the expected conflict
ConflictResolver conflictResolver = new ConflictResolver(Configuration);
List <RTConflict> conflicts = conflictResolver.GetConflicts();
Guid TFSCyclicLinkConflictTypeReferenceName = new Guid("BF1277E9-A218-4a2d-8C3C-A9501D30ECD5");
// Workaround for Bug 529648: Accept 1 or more conflicts. We should only generate 1 conflict, but for Two-way scenarios we generate 2.
Assert.IsTrue(conflicts.Count > 0, "There should be 1 or more conflicts");
foreach (RTConflict conflict in conflicts)
{
Assert.IsTrue(TFSCyclicLinkConflictTypeReferenceName.Equals(conflict.ConflictTypeReference.Value.ReferenceName),
"Conflict should be a TFS cyclic link reference conflict");
}
// fix the hierarchy on target, delete d->c => a->b->d c
TfsTargetAdapter.DeleteParentChildLink(targetIdC, targetIdD);
foreach (RTConflict rtConflict in conflicts)
{
// resolve the conflict by retrying
conflictResolver.TryResolveConflict(rtConflict, new ManualConflictResolutionAction(), "/");
// restart the migration tool, after sync,
RunAndNoValidate(true);
}
conflicts = conflictResolver.GetConflicts();
Assert.IsTrue(conflicts.Count == 0, "There should be no conflict");
// hiearchy should be c->a->b->d
Assert.AreEqual(2, TfsTargetAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(targetIdA));
Assert.AreEqual(2, TfsTargetAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(targetIdB));
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsTargetAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(targetIdC));
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsTargetAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(targetIdD));
if (TestEnvironment.MigrationTestType == MigrationTestType.OneWay)
{
// for one-way migration the source should be out of sync with the target now
Assert.AreEqual(2, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(sourceIdA));
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(sourceIdB));
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(sourceIdC));
Assert.AreEqual(0, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(sourceIdD));
}
else
{
// Two-way sync should be in sync with target now
// TODO: why does this work for TwoWayLeft but not TwoWayRight?
Assert.AreEqual(2, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(sourceIdA));
Assert.AreEqual(2, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(sourceIdB));
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(sourceIdC));
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(sourceIdD));
// verify sync result
WitDiffResult result = GetDiffResult();
// ignore Area/Iteration path mismatches
VerifySyncResult(result, new List <string> {
FIELD_ITERATION_PATH, FIELD_AREA_PATH
});
}
}
public void Link_CyclicLinkSamePairTest()
{
// Legend: x->y (y is a parent of x)
// T1: Source: a b
// T2: Sync
// T3: Target: a b
// T4: Source: add a->b ==> a->b
// Target: add b->a ==> b->a
// T5: Sync
// We should detect cyclic link and raise a conflict
// add a work item on source side
int sourceIdA = SourceAdapter.AddWorkItem("Bug", "A", "A");
int sourceIdB = SourceAdapter.AddWorkItem("Bug", "B", "B");
RunAndNoValidate();
int targetId1 = QueryTargetWorkItemID(sourceIdA);
int targetId2 = QueryTargetWorkItemID(sourceIdB);
TfsSourceAdapter.AddParentChildLink(sourceIdB, sourceIdA);
TfsTargetAdapter.AddParentChildLink(targetId1, targetId2);
RunAndNoValidate(true);
// verify the expected conflict
ConflictResolver conflictResolver = new ConflictResolver(Configuration);
List <RTConflict> conflicts = conflictResolver.GetConflicts();
Guid TFSCyclicLinkConflictTypeReferenceName = new Guid("BF1277E9-A218-4a2d-8C3C-A9501D30ECD5");
// Workaround for Bug 529648: Accept 1 or more conflicts. We should only generate 1 conflict, but for Two-way scenarios we generate 2.
Assert.IsTrue(conflicts.Count > 0, "There should be 1 or more conflicts");
foreach (RTConflict conflict in conflicts)
{
Assert.IsTrue(TFSCyclicLinkConflictTypeReferenceName.Equals(conflict.ConflictTypeReference.Value.ReferenceName),
"Conflict should be a TFS cyclic link reference conflict");
}
// fix the hierarchy on target, delete b->a ==> a b
TfsTargetAdapter.DeleteParentChildLink(targetId1, targetId2);
foreach (RTConflict conflict in conflicts)
{
// resolve the conflict by retrying
conflictResolver.TryResolveConflict(conflict, new ManualConflictResolutionAction(), "/");
// restart the session
RunAndNoValidate(true);
}
conflicts = conflictResolver.GetConflicts();
if (TestEnvironment.MigrationTestType == MigrationTestType.OneWay)
{
Assert.IsTrue(conflicts.Count == 0, "There should be no conflict");
}
else
{
// In two-way cases, migration back from target to source will still generate a conflict
// because we have not deleted a->b on the source
Assert.IsTrue(conflicts.Count == 1, "There should be one conflict");
}
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(sourceIdA));
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(sourceIdB));
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsTargetAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(targetId1));
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsTargetAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(targetId2));
// verify sync result
WitDiffResult result = GetDiffResult();
// ignore Area/Iteration path mismatches
VerifySyncResult(result, new List <string> {
FIELD_ITERATION_PATH, FIELD_AREA_PATH
});
}
public void Link_TwoParentsTest()
{
TestEnvironment.CustomActions += new MigrationTestEnvironment.Customize(ConfigCustomizer.CustomActions_DisableContextSync);
TestEnvironment.CustomActions += new MigrationTestEnvironment.Customize(ConfigCustomizer.CustomActions_SetOneWayNoContextSync);
// Legend: x->y (y is a parent of x)
// T1: Source: c->b->a
// T2: Sync
// T3: Target: c->b->a
// T4: Source: delete c->b, add a->c ==> b->a->c
// Target: delete b->a, add a->b ==> a->b, c->b (b has two children)
// T5: Sync
// add a work item on source side
string title1 = string.Format("A {0} {1}", TestContext.TestName, DateTime.Now.ToString("HH'_'mm'_'ss"));
int workitemIdA = SourceAdapter.AddWorkItem("Bug", title1, "A");
string title2 = string.Format("B {0} {1}", TestContext.TestName, DateTime.Now.ToString("HH'_'mm'_'ss"));
int workitemIdB = SourceAdapter.AddWorkItem("Bug", title2, "B");
string title3 = string.Format("C {0} {1}", TestContext.TestName, DateTime.Now.ToString("HH'_'mm'_'ss"));
int workitemIdC = SourceAdapter.AddWorkItem("Bug", title3, "C");
TestEnvironment.CustomActions += new MigrationTestEnvironment.Customize(SetTargetFilterString);
RunAndNoValidate();
// T1-T3: c->b->a
TfsSourceAdapter.AddParentChildLink(workitemIdB, workitemIdC);
TfsSourceAdapter.AddParentChildLink(workitemIdA, workitemIdB);
RunAndNoValidate(true);
// T4:
// Source: delete c->b, add a->c ==> b->a->c (a is the child of c)
TfsSourceAdapter.DeleteParentChildLink(workitemIdB, workitemIdC);
TfsSourceAdapter.AddParentChildLink(workitemIdC, workitemIdA);
// Target: delete b->a, add a->b ==> a->b, c->b (a is the child of b)
int mirroredIdA = QueryMirroredWorkItemID(workitemIdA);
int mirroredIdB = QueryMirroredWorkItemID(workitemIdB);
int mirroredIdC = QueryMirroredWorkItemID(workitemIdC);
TfsTargetAdapter.DeleteParentChildLink(mirroredIdA, mirroredIdB);
TfsTargetAdapter.AddParentChildLink(mirroredIdB, mirroredIdA);
// after sync:
// source: b->a->c
// target: a->b (adding a->c is conflicted)
RunAndNoValidate(true);
// verify the expected conflict
ConflictResolver conflictResolver = new ConflictResolver(Configuration);
List <RTConflict> conflicts = conflictResolver.GetConflicts();
Assert.AreEqual(1, conflicts.Count, "There should be 1 conflict");
Guid TFSMulitpleParentLinkConflictTypeReferenceName = new Guid("ADCE870C-33C0-46bc-9350-31660A463F9A");
Assert.IsTrue(TFSMulitpleParentLinkConflictTypeReferenceName.Equals(conflicts[0].ConflictTypeReference.Value.ReferenceName),
"It should be a TFSMulitpleParentLinkConflict");
// fix the hierarchy on target, delete a->b
// target: a, b, c
TfsTargetAdapter.DeleteParentChildLink(mirroredIdB, mirroredIdA);
// resolve the conflict by taking source side changes
conflictResolver.TryResolveConflict(conflicts[0], new ManualConflictResolutionAction(), "/");
// restart the migration tool, after sync
// source: b->a->c
// target: a->c
RunAndNoValidate(true);
conflicts = conflictResolver.GetConflicts();
Assert.IsTrue(conflicts.Count == 0, "There should be no conflict");
Assert.AreEqual(2, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(workitemIdA));
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(workitemIdB));
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(workitemIdC));
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsTargetAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(mirroredIdA));
Assert.AreEqual(0, TfsTargetAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(mirroredIdB));
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsTargetAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(mirroredIdC));
}
private void Link_CyclicLinkScenarioTwoWay()
{
// Legend: x->y (y is a parent of x)
// T1: Source: a->b->c d
// T2: Sync
// T3: Target: a->b->c d
// T4: Source: delete b->c, add c->a ==> a->b c->a d
// Target: delete b->c, add b->d , d->c ==> a->b->d->c
// T5: Sync
// We should detect cyclic link and raise a conflict
// add a work item on source side
string titleA = string.Format("A {0} {1}", TestContext.TestName, DateTime.Now.ToString("HH'_'mm'_'ss"));
int workitemIdA = SourceAdapter.AddWorkItem("Bug", titleA, "A");
string titleB = string.Format("B {0} {1}", TestContext.TestName, DateTime.Now.ToString("HH'_'mm'_'ss"));
int workitemIdB = SourceAdapter.AddWorkItem("Bug", titleB, "B");
string titleC = string.Format("C {0} {1}", TestContext.TestName, DateTime.Now.ToString("HH'_'mm'_'ss"));
int workitemIdC = SourceAdapter.AddWorkItem("Bug", titleC, "C");
string titleD = string.Format("C {0} {1}", TestContext.TestName, DateTime.Now.ToString("HH'_'mm'_'ss"));
int workitemIdD = SourceAdapter.AddWorkItem("Bug", titleD, "D");
TestEnvironment.CustomActions += new MigrationTestEnvironment.Customize(SetTargetFilterString);
RunAndNoValidate();
TfsSourceAdapter.AddParentChildLink(workitemIdC, workitemIdB);
TfsSourceAdapter.AddParentChildLink(workitemIdB, workitemIdA);
// after sync,
// Source: a->b->c d
// Target: a->b->c d
RunAndNoValidate(true);
// Source: delete b->c, add c->a => c->a->b d
TfsSourceAdapter.DeleteParentChildLink(workitemIdC, workitemIdB);
TfsSourceAdapter.AddParentChildLink(workitemIdA, workitemIdC);
// Target: delete b->c, add b->d , d->c => a->b->d->c
int mirroredIdA = QueryMirroredWorkItemID(workitemIdA);
int mirroredIdB = QueryMirroredWorkItemID(workitemIdB);
int mirroredIdC = QueryMirroredWorkItemID(workitemIdC);
int mirroredIdD = QueryMirroredWorkItemID(workitemIdD);
TfsTargetAdapter.DeleteParentChildLink(mirroredIdC, mirroredIdB);
TfsTargetAdapter.AddParentChildLink(mirroredIdD, mirroredIdB);
TfsTargetAdapter.AddParentChildLink(mirroredIdC, mirroredIdD);
// c->a from source will create cyclic link on target
RunAndNoValidate(true);
// verify the expected conflict
ConflictResolver conflictResolver = new ConflictResolver(Configuration);
List <RTConflict> conflicts = conflictResolver.GetConflicts();
Assert.AreEqual(2, conflicts.Count, "There should be 2 conflicts");
Guid TFSCyclicLinkConflictTypeReferenceName = new Guid("BF1277E9-A218-4a2d-8C3C-A9501D30ECD5");
Assert.IsTrue(TFSCyclicLinkConflictTypeReferenceName.Equals(conflicts[0].ConflictTypeReference.Value.ReferenceName),
"It should be a TFS cyclic link reference conflict");
Assert.IsTrue(TFSCyclicLinkConflictTypeReferenceName.Equals(conflicts[1].ConflictTypeReference.Value.ReferenceName),
"It should be a TFS cyclic link reference conflict");
// fix the hierarchy on target, delete a->b => a b->d->c
TfsTargetAdapter.DeleteParentChildLink(mirroredIdB, mirroredIdA);
// resolve the conflict by retrying
conflictResolver.TryResolveConflict(conflicts[0], new ManualConflictResolutionAction(), "/");
// restart the migration tool, after sync,
RunAndNoValidate(true);
// resolve the conflict by retrying
conflictResolver.TryResolveConflict(conflicts[1], new ManualConflictResolutionAction(), "/");
RunAndNoValidate(true);
conflicts = conflictResolver.GetConflicts();
Assert.IsTrue(conflicts.Count == 0, "There should be no conflict");
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(workitemIdA));
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(workitemIdB));
Assert.AreEqual(2, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(workitemIdC));
Assert.AreEqual(2, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(workitemIdD));
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsTargetAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(mirroredIdA));
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsTargetAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(mirroredIdB));
Assert.AreEqual(2, TfsTargetAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(mirroredIdC));
Assert.AreEqual(2, TfsTargetAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(mirroredIdD));
}
public void Link_CyclicLinkSamePairBidirectionalTest()
{
TestEnvironment.CustomActions += new MigrationTestEnvironment.Customize(ConfigCustomizer.CustomActions_DisableContextSync);
TestEnvironment.CustomActions += new MigrationTestEnvironment.Customize(ConfigCustomizer.CustomActions_SetBidirectionalNoContextSync);
// Legend: x->y (y is a parent of x)
// T1: Source: a b
// T2: Sync
// T3: Target: a b
// T4: Source: add a->b ==> a->b
// Target: add b->a ==> b->a
// T5: Sync
// We should detect cyclic link and raise a conflict
// add a work item on source side
string titleA = string.Format("A {0} {1}", TestContext.TestName, DateTime.Now.ToString("HH'_'mm'_'ss"));
int workitemIdA = SourceAdapter.AddWorkItem("Bug", titleA, "A");
string titleB = string.Format("B {0} {1}", TestContext.TestName, DateTime.Now.ToString("HH'_'mm'_'ss"));
int workitemIdB = SourceAdapter.AddWorkItem("Bug", titleB, "B");
TestEnvironment.CustomActions += new MigrationTestEnvironment.Customize(SetTargetFilterString);
RunAndNoValidate();
int mirroredIdA = QueryMirroredWorkItemID(workitemIdA);
int mirroredIdB = QueryMirroredWorkItemID(workitemIdB);
TfsSourceAdapter.AddParentChildLink(workitemIdB, workitemIdA);
TfsTargetAdapter.AddParentChildLink(mirroredIdA, mirroredIdB);
RunAndNoValidate(true);
// verify the expected conflict
ConflictResolver conflictResolver = new ConflictResolver(Configuration);
List <RTConflict> conflicts = conflictResolver.GetConflicts();
Assert.AreEqual(2, conflicts.Count, "There should be 2 conflicts");
Guid TFSCyclicLinkConflictTypeReferenceName = new Guid("BF1277E9-A218-4a2d-8C3C-A9501D30ECD5");
Assert.IsTrue(TFSCyclicLinkConflictTypeReferenceName.Equals(conflicts[0].ConflictTypeReference.Value.ReferenceName),
"It should be a TFS cyclic link reference conflict");
Assert.IsTrue(TFSCyclicLinkConflictTypeReferenceName.Equals(conflicts[1].ConflictTypeReference.Value.ReferenceName),
"It should be a TFS cyclic link reference conflict");
// fix the hierarchy on target, delete b->a ==> a b
TfsTargetAdapter.DeleteParentChildLink(mirroredIdA, mirroredIdB);
// resolve the conflict by retrying
conflictResolver.TryResolveConflict(conflicts[0], new ManualConflictResolutionAction(), "/");
// restart the session
RunAndNoValidate(true);
// resolve the conflict by retrying
conflictResolver.TryResolveConflict(conflicts[1], new ManualConflictResolutionAction(), "/");
// restart the session
RunAndNoValidate(true);
conflicts = conflictResolver.GetConflicts();
Assert.IsTrue(conflicts.Count == 0, "There should be no conflict");
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(workitemIdA));
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsSourceAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(workitemIdB));
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsTargetAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(mirroredIdA));
Assert.AreEqual(1, TfsTargetAdapter.GetRelatedLinkCount(mirroredIdB));
// verify sync result
WitDiffResult result = GetDiffResult();
// ignore Area/Iteration path mismatches
VerifySyncResult(result, new List <string> {
FIELD_ITERATION_PATH, FIELD_AREA_PATH
});
}
