/// <summary>
/// Returns true if the two partial methods have the same constraints.
/// </summary>
private static bool HaveSameConstraints(SourceMemberMethodSymbol part1, SourceMemberMethodSymbol part2)
{
Debug.Assert(!ReferenceEquals(part1, part2));
Debug.Assert(part1.Arity == part2.Arity);
var typeParameters1 = part1.TypeParameters;
int arity = typeParameters1.Length;
if (arity == 0)
{
return(true);
}
var typeParameters2 = part2.TypeParameters;
var indexedTypeParameters = IndexedTypeParameterSymbol.Take(arity);
var typeMap1 = new TypeMap(typeParameters1, indexedTypeParameters, allowAlpha: true);
var typeMap2 = new TypeMap(typeParameters2, indexedTypeParameters, allowAlpha: true);
return(MemberSignatureComparer.HaveSameConstraints(typeParameters1, typeMap1, typeParameters2, typeMap2));
}
internal static void FindExplicitlyImplementedMemberVerification(
this Symbol implementingMember,
Symbol implementedMember,
BindingDiagnosticBag diagnostics
)
{
if ((object)implementedMember == null)
{
return;
}
if (
implementingMember.ContainsTupleNames() &&
MemberSignatureComparer.ConsideringTupleNamesCreatesDifference(
implementingMember,
implementedMember
)
)
{
// it is ok to explicitly implement with no tuple names, for compatibility with C# 6, but otherwise names should match
var memberLocation = implementingMember.Locations[0];
diagnostics.Add(
ErrorCode.ERR_ImplBadTupleNames,
memberLocation,
implementingMember,
implementedMember
);
}
// In constructed types, it is possible that two method signatures could differ by only ref/out
// after substitution. We look for this as part of explicit implementation because, if someone
// tried to implement the ambiguous interface implicitly, we would separately raise an error about
// the implicit implementation methods differing by only ref/out.
FindExplicitImplementationCollisions(
implementingMember,
implementedMember,
diagnostics
);
}
private static Symbol FindExplicitlyImplementedMember(
Symbol implementingMember,
TypeSymbol explicitInterfaceType,
string interfaceMemberName,
ExplicitInterfaceSpecifierSyntax explicitInterfaceSpecifierSyntax,
DiagnosticBag diagnostics)
{
if ((object)explicitInterfaceType == null)
{
return(null);
}
var memberLocation = implementingMember.Locations[0];
var containingType = implementingMember.ContainingType;
var containingTypeKind = containingType.TypeKind;
if (containingTypeKind != TypeKind.Class && containingTypeKind != TypeKind.Struct)
{
diagnostics.Add(ErrorCode.ERR_ExplicitInterfaceImplementationInNonClassOrStruct, memberLocation, implementingMember);
return(null);
}
if (!explicitInterfaceType.IsInterfaceType())
{
//we'd like to highlight just the type part of the name
var explicitInterfaceSyntax = explicitInterfaceSpecifierSyntax.Name;
var location = new SourceLocation(explicitInterfaceSyntax);
diagnostics.Add(ErrorCode.ERR_ExplicitInterfaceImplementationNotInterface, location, explicitInterfaceType);
return(null);
}
var explicitInterfaceNamedType = (NamedTypeSymbol)explicitInterfaceType;
// 13.4.1: "For an explicit interface member implementation to be valid, the class or struct must name an
// interface in its base class list that contains a member ..."
if (!containingType.InterfacesAndTheirBaseInterfacesNoUseSiteDiagnostics.Contains(explicitInterfaceNamedType))
{
//we'd like to highlight just the type part of the name
var explicitInterfaceSyntax = explicitInterfaceSpecifierSyntax.Name;
var location = new SourceLocation(explicitInterfaceSyntax);
diagnostics.Add(ErrorCode.ERR_ClassDoesntImplementInterface, location, implementingMember, explicitInterfaceNamedType);
//do a lookup anyway
}
var hasParamsParam = implementingMember.HasParamsParameter();
// Setting this flag to true does not imply that an interface member has been successfully implemented.
// It just indicates that a corresponding interface member has been found (there may still be errors).
var foundMatchingMember = false;
Symbol implementedMember = null;
foreach (Symbol interfaceMember in explicitInterfaceNamedType.GetMembers(interfaceMemberName))
{
// At this point, we know that explicitInterfaceNamedType is an interface, so candidate must be public
// and, therefore, accessible. So we don't need to check that.
// However, metadata interface members can be static - we ignore them, as does Dev10.
if (interfaceMember.Kind != implementingMember.Kind || interfaceMember.IsStatic)
{
continue;
}
if (MemberSignatureComparer.ExplicitImplementationComparer.Equals(implementingMember, interfaceMember))
{
foundMatchingMember = true;
// Cannot implement accessor directly unless
// the accessor is from an indexed property.
if (interfaceMember.IsAccessor() && !((MethodSymbol)interfaceMember).IsIndexedPropertyAccessor())
{
diagnostics.Add(ErrorCode.ERR_ExplicitMethodImplAccessor, memberLocation, implementingMember, interfaceMember);
}
else
{
if (interfaceMember.MustCallMethodsDirectly())
{
diagnostics.Add(ErrorCode.ERR_BogusExplicitImpl, memberLocation, implementingMember, interfaceMember);
}
else if (hasParamsParam && !interfaceMember.HasParamsParameter())
{
// Note: no error for !hasParamsParam && interfaceMethod.HasParamsParameter()
// Still counts as an implementation.
diagnostics.Add(ErrorCode.ERR_ExplicitImplParams, memberLocation, implementingMember, interfaceMember);
}
implementedMember = interfaceMember;
break;
}
}
}
if (!foundMatchingMember)
{
// CONSIDER: we may wish to suppress this error in the event that another error
// has been reported about the signature.
diagnostics.Add(ErrorCode.ERR_InterfaceMemberNotFound, memberLocation, implementingMember);
}
if (implementingMember.ContainsTupleNames() && MemberSignatureComparer.ConsideringTupleNamesCreatesDifference(implementingMember, implementedMember))
{
// it is ok to explicitly implement with no tuple names, for compatibility with C# 6, but otherwise names should match
diagnostics.Add(ErrorCode.ERR_ImplBadTupleNames, memberLocation, implementingMember, implementedMember);
}
// In constructed types, it is possible that two method signatures could differ by only ref/out
// after substitution. We look for this as part of explicit implementation because, if someone
// tried to implement the ambiguous interface implicitly, we would separately raise an error about
// the implicit implementation methods differing by only ref/out.
FindExplicitImplementationCollisions(implementingMember, implementedMember, diagnostics);
return(implementedMember);
}