protected Task <UserViewFull> SpecialWrite(UserViewFull original, UserViewFull updated, Requester requester)
{
//All of these force a public update, which is honestly simpler
if (original.avatar != updated.avatar || original.username != updated.username ||
original.special != updated.special)
{
return(service.WriteAsync(updated, requester));
}
else
{
return(service.WriteSpecialAsync(original.id, requester, p =>
{
//Regardless of if these were updated or not, set them anyway. Shouldn't do any harm...
service.Source.SetEmail(p, updated);
service.Source.SetHidelist(p, updated);
service.Source.SetPassword(p, updated);
}));
}
}
public ModuleViewServiceTests()
{
userService = CreateService <UserViewService>();
superUser = userService.WriteAsync(new UserViewFull()
{
username = "******"
}, system).Result;
basicUser = userService.WriteAsync(new UserViewFull()
{
username = "******"
}, system).Result;
super = new Requester()
{
userId = superUser.id
};
basic = new Requester()
{
userId = basicUser.id
};
sysConfig.SuperUsers.Add(superUser.id);
}
public void SubcommandArguments_User()
{
//The subcommands variable exists but is the wrong type, the module system shouldn't care
var modview = new ModuleView()
{
name = "test", code = @"
subcommands = {[""wow""]={[""arguments""]={""first_user"",""second_user""}} }
function command_wow(uid, user1, user2)
return ""Id: "" .. uid .. "" User1: "" .. user1 .. "" User2: "" .. user2
end"
};
//Fragile test, should inject a fake user service that always says the user is good. oh well
userService.WriteAsync(new UserViewFull()
{
username = "******"
}, new Requester()
{
system = true
}).Wait();
userService.WriteAsync(new UserViewFull()
{
username = "******"
}, new Requester()
{
system = true
}).Wait();
var mod = service.UpdateModule(modview);
var result = service.RunCommand("test", "wow 1 2(lol_username!)", new Requester()
{
userId = 8
});
Assert.Equal("Id: 8 User1: 1 User2: 2", result);
}
public async Task <ReadTestUnit> CreateUnitAsync()
{
//First, create some users!
var unit = new ReadTestUnit();
var requester = new Requester()
{
system = true
};
unit.commonUser = await userService.WriteAsync(new UserViewFull()
{
username = "******"
}, requester);
unit.specialUser = await userService.WriteAsync(new UserViewFull()
{
username = "******"
}, requester);
unit.commonContent = await contentService.WriteAsync(new ContentView()
{
name = "commonContent", parentId = 0, permissions = new Dictionary <long, string>()
{
{ 0, "cr" }
}
}, requester);
unit.specialContent = await contentService.WriteAsync(new ContentView()
{
name = "specialContent", parentId = 0, permissions = new Dictionary <long, string>()
{
{ unit.specialUser.id, "cr" }
}
}, requester);
return(unit);
}
public async Task <ActionResult <UserView> > Register([FromBody] UserCredential user)
{
//One day, fix these so they're the "standard" bad object request from model validation!!
//Perhaps do custom validation!
if (user.username == null)
{
return(BadRequest("Must provide a username!"));
}
if (user.email == null)
{
return(BadRequest("Must provide an email!"));
}
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(user.password))
{
return(BadRequest("Must provide a password!"));
}
if (!ValidUsername(user.username))
{
return(BadRequest("Bad username: no spaces!"));
}
var requester = GetRequesterNoFail();
if (await service.FindByUsernameAsync(user.username, requester) != null || await service.FindByEmailAsync(user.email, requester) != null)
{
return(BadRequest("This user already seems to exist!"));
}
var fullUser = mapper.Map <UserViewFull>(user);
SetPassword(fullUser, fullUser.password);
fullUser.registrationKey = Guid.NewGuid().ToString();
return(await ThrowToAction(async() => mapper.Map <UserView>(await service.WriteAsync(fullUser, requester))));
}