private void OnServerConnectionAvailable(object sender, SecureConnectionResults args)
{
try
{
if (args.AsyncException != null)
{
_Log.ErrorFormat("Client connection failed {0}", args.AsyncException);
return;
}
SslInfo sslInfo = args.SecureInfo;
Session session = SessionMapping.Get();
Client client = new Client(sslInfo.SslStream, session, sslInfo.NetworkStream.BufferInUsed, sslInfo.Socket);
SenderReceiverPair relation = new SenderReceiverPair(client, new ReceiveAgent());
Application.Default.AgentController.Add(session, relation.Receiver, relation.Sender);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
_Log.Error(ex);
}
}
public bool Add(Session session, SenderReceiverPair pair)
{
return(_Clients.TryAdd(session, pair));
}
public bool Remove(Session session, out SenderReceiverPair pair)
{
return(_Clients.TryRemove(session, out pair));
}
/// <summary>
/// Check each cell in the connectivity matrix for throughput numbers that are above the warning threshold.
/// If the list changed since last time we checked, queue events.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="connectivityMatrix"></param>
/// <param name="events"></param>
private void CheckThroughput(ConnectivityMatrix connectivityMatrix, List<DiagnosticUpdateEventArgs> events) {
/// Note: The sender and receiver numbers have been observed occasionally to be off by up to 20%
/// when there are no apparent throughput problems. This is probably just due to the fact that
/// the reporting intervals are not aligned. It seems rare however for the numbers to be off by
/// more than 10% on consecutive intervals. Given the inaccuracy, probably the best approach will
/// be to use a weighted average. The simple approach taken here is to average the current value
/// with the previous average.
List<SenderReceiverPair> currentPairs = new List<SenderReceiverPair>();
//Update throughput averages
foreach (Row r in connectivityMatrix.Rows) {
foreach (Cell c in r.Cells) {
SenderReceiverPair srp = new SenderReceiverPair(r.SenderCname, c.ReceiverCname);
currentPairs.Add(srp);
if (!m_ThroughputAverages.ContainsKey(srp)) {
//Give every new SenderReceiverPair a zero to start and ignore the first set of data
//since we can sometimes get big throughput differentials during the join.
m_ThroughputAverages.Add(srp, 0.0);
//Trace.WriteLine("Created a new throughput average for this pair. Ignoring current interval. " + srp.Sender + "/" + srp.Receiver );
continue;
}
if (c.ThroughputDifferential < 0) {
//Negative ThroughputDifferential means more packets were received than sent. Count it as zero.
m_ThroughputAverages[srp] = (m_ThroughputAverages[srp] / 2.0);
//Trace.WriteLine("Differential for this interval is a negative number; counting as zero");
//Trace.WriteLine("Throughput average for " + srp.Sender + "/" + srp.Receiver + " is " + m_ThroughputAverages[srp].ToString());
continue;
}
if (r.SenderPacketRate == 0) {
//Trace.WriteLine("Sender packet rate is zero.");
continue;
}
//Average current and previous values
double normalizedThroughputDifferential = c.ThroughputDifferential / r.SenderPacketRate;
m_ThroughputAverages[srp] = (m_ThroughputAverages[srp] + normalizedThroughputDifferential) / 2.0;
//Trace.WriteLine("Differential for this interval is " + normalizedThroughputDifferential.ToString());
//Trace.WriteLine("Throughput average for " + srp.Sender + "/" + srp.Receiver + " is " + m_ThroughputAverages[srp].ToString());
}
}
//Purge averages for pairs that do not appear in the current matrix. These probably left the venue.
Dictionary<SenderReceiverPair, double> newAverages = new Dictionary<SenderReceiverPair, double>();
foreach (SenderReceiverPair srp in m_ThroughputAverages.Keys) {
if (currentPairs.Contains(srp)) {
newAverages.Add(srp, m_ThroughputAverages[srp]);
}
else {
//Trace.WriteLine("Purging pair: " + srp.Sender + "/" + srp.Receiver);
}
}
m_ThroughputAverages = newAverages;
//Look for averages above the warning threshold, and add warning events.
List<SenderReceiverPair> currentThroughputWarnings = new List<SenderReceiverPair>();
foreach (SenderReceiverPair srp in m_ThroughputAverages.Keys) {
if (m_ThroughputAverages[srp] > DiagnosticMonitor.ThroughputThreshold) {
currentThroughputWarnings.Add(srp);
//Add event only if it is not already in the warning state
if (!m_PreviousThroughputWarnings.Contains(srp)) {
events.Add(new DiagnosticUpdateEventArgs(DiagnosticEventType.ThroughputWarningAdded, srp.Sender, srp.Receiver));
}
}
}
//Look for pairs in the previous list but not in the current list and add event to remove the warning.
foreach (SenderReceiverPair srp in m_PreviousThroughputWarnings) {
if (!currentThroughputWarnings.Contains(srp)) {
events.Add(new DiagnosticUpdateEventArgs(DiagnosticEventType.ThroughputWarningRemoved, srp.Sender, srp.Receiver));
}
}
//Save the current list for next time.
m_PreviousThroughputWarnings = currentThroughputWarnings;
}
public override bool Equals(object otherobj)
{
SenderReceiverPair other = (SenderReceiverPair)otherobj;
return(this.Sender.Equals(other.Sender) && this.Receiver.Equals(other.Receiver));
}
/// <summary>
/// Check each cell in the connectivity matrix for throughput numbers that are above the warning threshold.
/// If the list changed since last time we checked, queue events.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="connectivityMatrix"></param>
/// <param name="events"></param>
private void CheckThroughput(ConnectivityMatrix connectivityMatrix, List <DiagnosticUpdateEventArgs> events)
{
/// Note: The sender and receiver numbers have been observed occasionally to be off by up to 20%
/// when there are no apparent throughput problems. This is probably just due to the fact that
/// the reporting intervals are not aligned. It seems rare however for the numbers to be off by
/// more than 10% on consecutive intervals. Given the inaccuracy, probably the best approach will
/// be to use a weighted average. The simple approach taken here is to average the current value
/// with the previous average.
List <SenderReceiverPair> currentPairs = new List <SenderReceiverPair>();
//Update throughput averages
foreach (Row r in connectivityMatrix.Rows)
{
foreach (Cell c in r.Cells)
{
SenderReceiverPair srp = new SenderReceiverPair(r.SenderCname, c.ReceiverCname);
currentPairs.Add(srp);
if (!m_ThroughputAverages.ContainsKey(srp))
{
//Give every new SenderReceiverPair a zero to start and ignore the first set of data
//since we can sometimes get big throughput differentials during the join.
m_ThroughputAverages.Add(srp, 0.0);
//Trace.WriteLine("Created a new throughput average for this pair. Ignoring current interval. " + srp.Sender + "/" + srp.Receiver );
continue;
}
if (c.ThroughputDifferential < 0)
{
//Negative ThroughputDifferential means more packets were received than sent. Count it as zero.
m_ThroughputAverages[srp] = (m_ThroughputAverages[srp] / 2.0);
//Trace.WriteLine("Differential for this interval is a negative number; counting as zero");
//Trace.WriteLine("Throughput average for " + srp.Sender + "/" + srp.Receiver + " is " + m_ThroughputAverages[srp].ToString());
continue;
}
if (r.SenderPacketRate == 0)
{
//Trace.WriteLine("Sender packet rate is zero.");
continue;
}
//Average current and previous values
double normalizedThroughputDifferential = c.ThroughputDifferential / r.SenderPacketRate;
m_ThroughputAverages[srp] = (m_ThroughputAverages[srp] + normalizedThroughputDifferential) / 2.0;
//Trace.WriteLine("Differential for this interval is " + normalizedThroughputDifferential.ToString());
//Trace.WriteLine("Throughput average for " + srp.Sender + "/" + srp.Receiver + " is " + m_ThroughputAverages[srp].ToString());
}
}
//Purge averages for pairs that do not appear in the current matrix. These probably left the venue.
Dictionary <SenderReceiverPair, double> newAverages = new Dictionary <SenderReceiverPair, double>();
foreach (SenderReceiverPair srp in m_ThroughputAverages.Keys)
{
if (currentPairs.Contains(srp))
{
newAverages.Add(srp, m_ThroughputAverages[srp]);
}
else
{
//Trace.WriteLine("Purging pair: " + srp.Sender + "/" + srp.Receiver);
}
}
m_ThroughputAverages = newAverages;
//Look for averages above the warning threshold, and add warning events.
List <SenderReceiverPair> currentThroughputWarnings = new List <SenderReceiverPair>();
foreach (SenderReceiverPair srp in m_ThroughputAverages.Keys)
{
if (m_ThroughputAverages[srp] > DiagnosticMonitor.ThroughputThreshold)
{
currentThroughputWarnings.Add(srp);
//Add event only if it is not already in the warning state
if (!m_PreviousThroughputWarnings.Contains(srp))
{
events.Add(new DiagnosticUpdateEventArgs(DiagnosticEventType.ThroughputWarningAdded, srp.Sender, srp.Receiver));
}
}
}
//Look for pairs in the previous list but not in the current list and add event to remove the warning.
foreach (SenderReceiverPair srp in m_PreviousThroughputWarnings)
{
if (!currentThroughputWarnings.Contains(srp))
{
events.Add(new DiagnosticUpdateEventArgs(DiagnosticEventType.ThroughputWarningRemoved, srp.Sender, srp.Receiver));
}
}
//Save the current list for next time.
m_PreviousThroughputWarnings = currentThroughputWarnings;
}