public static void Test()
{
var alice = Entity.Of("Alice");
var bob = Entity.Of("Bob");
var p = new SVX_Test_Concat(alice);
var req1 = new Concat2Request("A", "B");
var resp1 = SVX_Ops.Call(p.Concat2, req1);
var req2 = new Concat2Request(resp1.output, "C");
var resp2 = SVX_Ops.Call(p.Concat2, req2);
var chainResp = SVX_Ops.Call(p.Chain, resp1, resp2);
var producer = Channel.GenerateNew(bob);
var sender = Channel.GenerateNew(bob);
SVX_Ops.TransferForTesting(chainResp, producer, sender);
// Demonstrate that we can assume acts-for relationships and that
// we've axiomatized that acts-for is transitive. Of course, the
// acts-for relationships in this example do not represent the ones
// we would assume in any real protocol.
var respWithAssumption = SVX_Ops.Call(p.AssumeProducerActsForAlice, chainResp);
SVX_Ops.Certify(respWithAssumption, p.Predicate);
}
public static void Test()
{
var idp = new IdP(idpPrincipal);
var rp = new RP(rpPrincipal);
var aliceIdP = Channel.GenerateNew(idpPrincipal);
var aliceRP = Channel.GenerateNew(rpPrincipal);
var idpReq = new SignInIdPReq {
username = "******",
password = "******",
SVX_sender = aliceIdP
};
var rpReq = SVX_Ops.Call(idp.SignInIdP, idpReq);
// Imagine the SignInRPReq was signed by the IdP.
SVX_Ops.TransferForTesting(rpReq, idpPrincipal, aliceRP);
var conc = SVX_Ops.Call(rp.SignInRP, rpReq);
SVX_Ops.Certify(conc, rp.LoginSafety);
}