public void Hide()
{
ActiveActors.ForEach(x => GameObject.Destroy(x.gameObject));
ActiveActors.Clear();
gameObject.SetActive(false);
if (pausable != null)
{
pausable.Resume();
}
}
async public static void Run()
{
ScriptManager.LoadScripts();
Data = new GameEntities("Server=KATANAMUD\\SQLEXPRESS;Database=KatanaMUD;integrated security=True;");
Data.LoadFromDatabase();
var gameTime = Data.Settings.Find("GameTime");
if (gameTime == null)
{
GameTime = new TimeSpan(0);
gameTime = Data.Settings.New("GameTime");
gameTime.Value = 0.ToString();
}
else
{
GameTime = new TimeSpan(long.Parse(gameTime.Value));
}
DateTime lastTime = DateTime.UtcNow;
var saveTime = lastTime.AddMinutes(1);
Console.WriteLine("KatanaMUD 0.2 Server Started");
while (true)
{
try
{
var newTime = DateTime.UtcNow;
var timeDifference = newTime.Subtract(lastTime);
GameTime = GameTime.Add(timeDifference);
gameTime.Value = GameTime.Ticks.ToString();
// handle connections/disconnections
Connections.HandleConnectsAndDisconnects();
// Handle all timed events.
while (_eventQueue.Count > 0 && _eventQueue.FindMin().ExecutionTime < GameTime)
{
var ev = _eventQueue.DeleteMin();
ev.Execute();
}
// Grab a snapshot of all active actors (will clear the active list)
var actors = ActiveActors.Snapshot();
// Extract the messages from the actors, and order them by time.
var messages = actors.Select(x =>
{
bool remaining;
var message = x.GetNextMessage(out remaining);
return(Tuple.Create(x, message, remaining));
}).OrderBy(x => x.Item2?.MessageTime).ToList();
// If any actors have more messages, re-add them to the active list.
// we only grab the top message from each actor because each action may have a time component to it,
// so that if the action causes the user to pause, we cannot process the second message yet.
// We'll grab the next message on the next game loop. It's not the best system, but it's
// workable, and it serves to effectively limit messages to 1 per loop, or about 10-20 per second
// depending on how long the loop sleep period is. I don't believe this will be a problem in practice,
// though I suppose there's always the possibility of a timing exploit somewhere.
foreach (var message in messages.Where(x => x.Item3 == true))
{
ActiveActors.Add(message.Item1);
}
foreach (var message in messages.Where(x => x.Item2 != null))
{
message.Item2.Process(message.Item1);
}
//TODO: This could really be done in parallel, or even on separate threads.
// I figure this should be addressed sooner rather than later, since once combat is enabled, output messages could get
// laggy if we simply perform awaits on each one instead of letting the hardware do its thing and go on to the next.
foreach (var connection in Connections.GetConnections())
{
var handler = connection?.Actor?.MessageHandler as ConnectionMessageHandler;
if (handler != null)
{
await handler.SendMessages();
}
}
lastTime = newTime;
// Save changes to the database.
if (Data.ForceSave || saveTime < newTime)
{
Data.ForceSave = false;
// TODO: Make the save time configurable eventually.
saveTime = newTime.AddMinutes(1);
Data.SaveChanges();
}
Thread.Sleep(50);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Console.WriteLine(String.Format("[{0}] Exception: {1}", DateTime.Now.ToShortTimeString(), ex.ToString()));
}
}
}
