public virtual void testBackoffDecrease()
{
// when starting a number of process instances process instance
for (int i = 0; i < 15; i++)
{
engineRule.RuntimeService.startProcessInstanceByKey("simpleAsyncProcess").Id;
}
// ensure that both acquisition threads acquire the same jobs thereby provoking an optimistic locking exception
JobAcquisitionTestHelper.suspendInstances(engineRule.ProcessEngine, 12);
// when starting job execution, both acquisition threads wait before acquiring something
jobExecutor1.start();
acquisitionThread1.waitForSync();
jobExecutor2.start();
acquisitionThread2.waitForSync();
// when continuing acquisition thread 1
// then it is able to acquire and execute all jobs
acquisitionThread1.makeContinueAndWaitForSync();
// when continuing acquisition thread 2
// acquisition fails with an OLE
acquisitionThread2.makeContinueAndWaitForSync();
jobExecutor1.shutdown();
acquisitionThread1.waitUntilDone();
acquisitionThread2.makeContinueAndWaitForSync();
// such that acquisition thread 2 performs backoff
IList <RecordedWaitEvent> jobExecutor2WaitEvents = jobExecutor2.AcquireJobsRunnable.WaitEvents;
Assert.assertEquals(1, jobExecutor2WaitEvents.Count);
// when in the next cycles acquisition thread2 successfully acquires jobs without OLE for n times
JobAcquisitionTestHelper.activateInstances(engineRule.ProcessEngine, 12);
for (int i = 0; i < BACKOFF_DECREASE_THRESHOLD; i++)
{
// backoff has not decreased yet
Assert.assertTrue(jobExecutor2WaitEvents[i].TimeBetweenAcquisitions > 0);
acquisitionThread2.makeContinueAndWaitForSync(); // acquire
acquisitionThread2.makeContinueAndWaitForSync(); // continue after acquisition with next cycle
}
// it decreases its backoff again
long lastBackoff = jobExecutor2WaitEvents[BACKOFF_DECREASE_THRESHOLD].TimeBetweenAcquisitions;
Assert.assertEquals(0, lastBackoff);
}
public virtual void testBackoffOnOptimisticLocking()
{
// when starting a number of process instances process instance
for (int i = 0; i < 9; i++)
{
engineRule.RuntimeService.startProcessInstanceByKey("simpleAsyncProcess").Id;
}
// ensure that both acquisition threads acquire the same jobs thereby provoking an optimistic locking exception
JobAcquisitionTestHelper.suspendInstances(engineRule.ProcessEngine, 6);
// when starting job execution, both acquisition threads wait before acquiring something
jobExecutor1.start();
acquisitionThread1.waitForSync();
jobExecutor2.start();
acquisitionThread2.waitForSync();
// when having both threads acquire jobs
// then both wait before committing the acquiring transaction (AcquireJobsCmd)
acquisitionThread1.makeContinueAndWaitForSync();
acquisitionThread2.makeContinueAndWaitForSync();
// when continuing acquisition thread 1
acquisitionThread1.makeContinueAndWaitForSync();
// then it has not performed waiting since it was able to acquire and execute all jobs
IList <RecordedWaitEvent> jobExecutor1WaitEvents = jobExecutor1.AcquireJobsRunnable.WaitEvents;
Assert.assertEquals(1, jobExecutor1WaitEvents.Count);
Assert.assertEquals(0, jobExecutor1WaitEvents[0].TimeBetweenAcquisitions);
// when continuing acquisition thread 2, acquisition fails with an OLE
acquisitionThread2.makeContinueAndWaitForSync();
// and has performed backoff
IList <RecordedWaitEvent> jobExecutor2WaitEvents = jobExecutor2.AcquireJobsRunnable.WaitEvents;
Assert.assertEquals(1, jobExecutor2WaitEvents.Count);
RecordedWaitEvent waitEvent = jobExecutor2WaitEvents[0];
// we don't know the exact wait time,
// since there is random jitter applied
JobAcquisitionTestHelper.assertInBetween(BASE_BACKOFF_TIME, BASE_BACKOFF_TIME + BASE_BACKOFF_TIME / 2, waitEvent.TimeBetweenAcquisitions);
// when performing another cycle of acquisition
JobAcquisitionTestHelper.activateInstances(engineRule.ProcessEngine, 6);
acquisitionThread1.makeContinueAndWaitForSync();
acquisitionThread2.makeContinueAndWaitForSync();
// and thread 1 again acquires all jobs successfully
acquisitionThread1.makeContinueAndWaitForSync();
// while thread 2 again fails with OLE
acquisitionThread2.makeContinueAndWaitForSync();
// then thread 1 has tried to acquired 3 jobs again
IList <RecordedAcquisitionEvent> jobExecutor1AcquisitionEvents = jobExecutor1.AcquireJobsRunnable.AcquisitionEvents;
RecordedAcquisitionEvent secondAcquisitionAttempt = jobExecutor1AcquisitionEvents[1];
Assert.assertEquals(3, secondAcquisitionAttempt.NumJobsToAcquire);
// and not waited
jobExecutor1WaitEvents = jobExecutor1.AcquireJobsRunnable.WaitEvents;
Assert.assertEquals(2, jobExecutor1WaitEvents.Count);
Assert.assertEquals(0, jobExecutor1WaitEvents[1].TimeBetweenAcquisitions);
// then thread 2 has tried to acquire 6 jobs this time
IList <RecordedAcquisitionEvent> jobExecutor2AcquisitionEvents = jobExecutor2.AcquireJobsRunnable.AcquisitionEvents;
secondAcquisitionAttempt = jobExecutor2AcquisitionEvents[1];
Assert.assertEquals(6, secondAcquisitionAttempt.NumJobsToAcquire);
// and again increased its backoff
jobExecutor2WaitEvents = jobExecutor2.AcquireJobsRunnable.WaitEvents;
Assert.assertEquals(2, jobExecutor2WaitEvents.Count);
RecordedWaitEvent secondWaitEvent = jobExecutor2WaitEvents[1];
long expectedBackoffTime = BASE_BACKOFF_TIME * BACKOFF_FACTOR; // 1000 * 2^1
JobAcquisitionTestHelper.assertInBetween(expectedBackoffTime, expectedBackoffTime + expectedBackoffTime / 2, secondWaitEvent.TimeBetweenAcquisitions);
}
