public void u16(RawBitWriter <TMemory> b, u16 value)
{
value++;
u32 map = 0;
i32 index = -1;
for (var i = Coder.Fibonacci.u16Lookup.Length - 1; i >= 0; i--)
{
if (value >= Coder.Fibonacci.u16Lookup[i])
{
if (index == -1)
{
index = i + 1;
map = BitOperations.WriteBit(map, index, true);
}
map = BitOperations.WriteBit(map, i, true);
value -= Coder.Fibonacci.u16Lookup[i];
}
}
for (var i = 0; i <= index; i++)
{
// TODO: optimize
var bit = BitOperations.ExtractBit(map, i);
b.b(bit);
}
}
public void u16(RawBitWriter <TMemory> b, u16 value)
{
while (value >= 0b10000000)
{
b.u8Raw((u8)(value | 0b10000000)); value >>= 7;
}
b.u8Raw((u8)value);
}
public void u32(RawBitWriter <TMemory> b, u32 value)
// 1. trying to use generic method or class with call for inline and optimize with only interface constraint losses great of performance
// 2. passing instance of class buffer by `in` slows down by 10
// 3. per call instance of holder struct also losts 10 percentage of performance (not sure if share per thread)
{
// TODO: how to use CPU parallelism here ? unrol loop? couple of temporal variables?
// TODO: mere 8 and 8 into one 16? write special handling code for 8 and 16 coming from outside?
// oneliner version to use if need copy paste
while (value >= 0b10000000)
{
b.u8Raw((u8)(value | 0b10000000)); value >>= 7;
}
b.u8Raw((u8)value);
}
public void u8()
{
var storage = new u32ArrayMemory(new u32[42]);
var writer = new RawBitWriter <u32ArrayMemory>(storage);
u16 v1 = 42;
u16 v2 = 666;
writer.u16(v1, 16);
Assert.AreEqual(16, writer.BitsWritten);
writer.u16(v2, 10);
writer.Align();
var reader = new RawBitReader <u32ArrayMemory>(storage);
var rv1 = reader.u16(16);
var rv2 = reader.u16(10);
Assert.AreEqual(v1, rv1);
Assert.AreEqual(v2, rv2);
}
public void u8(RawBitWriter <TMemory> b, u8 value) => b.u8Raw(value);
public void u16(RawBitWriter <TMemory> b, u16 value) => b.u16(value, 16);
public void i32(RawBitWriter <TMemory> b, i32 value, u8 numberOfBits) => i32(b, value);
public void u32(RawBitWriter <TMemory> b, u32 value) => b.u32(value, 32);
public void i32(RawBitWriter <TMemory> b, i32 value) => b.u32((u32)value, 32);
public void i32(RawBitWriter <TMemory> b, i32 value, u8 numberOfBits) => b.u32(encode(value), numberOfBits);
public void i32(RawBitWriter <TMemory> b, i32 value)
{
u32(b, encode(value));
}
public void i32(RawBitWriter <TMemory> b, i32 value)
{
// have tried to have only encode, with no i32 method,
// but double layer of constrained generics does not propagate on .NET Core and leads to loss of performance
u32(b, encode(value));
}
