public override bool Equals(System.Object object_Renamed)
{
bool isEqual = false;
if (base.Equals(object_Renamed) && (object_Renamed is SymbolClass))
{
SymbolClass symbolClasses = (SymbolClass)object_Renamed;
if (equals(symbolClasses.class2tag, this.class2tag))
{
isEqual = true;
}
}
return(isEqual);
}
public virtual void symbolClass(SymbolClass tag)
{
}
private Tag decodeSymbolClass()
{
SymbolClass t = new SymbolClass();
int count = r.readUI16();
t.class2tag = new System.Collections.Hashtable(count);
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++)
{
int idref = r.readUI16();
String name = r.readString();
if (idref == 0)
{
t.topLevelClass = name;
continue;
}
DefineTag ref_Renamed = dict.getTag(idref);
t.class2tag[name] = ref_Renamed;
if (ref_Renamed.name != null)
{
if (!ref_Renamed.name.Equals(name))
{
handler.error("SymbolClass: symbol " + idref + " already exported as " + ref_Renamed.name);
}
//else
//{
// FIXME: is this right? seem to be getting redundant message in swfdumps that work right in the player
// FIXME: We should eventually enforce that export names not be used in zaphod movies,
// FIXME: but in the short term, all this message means is that the symbol was both exported
// FIXME: via ExportAssets and also associated with a class via SymbolClass. They have
// FIXME: different semantic meanings, so this error is a bit off-base. --rg
// handler.error("Redundant SymbolClass of " + ref.name + ". Found " + ref.getClass().getName() + " of same name in dictionary.");
//}
}
else
{
DefineTag other = dict.getTag(name);
if (other != null)
{
int id = dict.getId(other);
handler.error("Symbol " + name + " already refers to ID " + id);
}
ref_Renamed.name = name;
dict.addName(ref_Renamed, name);
}
}
return t;
}