public void ValidateInvalidBusinessIds(string businessId)
{
MockWebContext ctx = new MockWebContext();
ctx.ActionArguments.Add("code", businessId);
var actExeContext = ctx.CreateActionExecutingContext();
ValidateRegExAttribute attr = new ValidateRegExAttribute("code", @"^[0-9]{7}-[0-9]{1}$");
attr.OnActionExecuting(actExeContext);
actExeContext.HttpContext.Response.StatusCode.Should().Be((int)HttpStatusCode.BadRequest);
}
public void ValidateValidBusinessIds(string businessId)
{
MockWebContext ctx = new MockWebContext();
ctx.ActionArguments.Add("code", businessId);
var actExeContext = ctx.CreateActionExecutingContext();
ValidateRegExAttribute attr = new ValidateRegExAttribute("code", @"^[0-9]{7}-[0-9]{1}$");
attr.OnActionExecuting(actExeContext);
// if everything is ok the status is not changed so default 0 value is the expected value and not http 200
actExeContext.HttpContext.Response.StatusCode.Should().Be(0);
}
public void ShouldHandleKeyNameNotFound()
{
// the attribute should handle cases that the key is not found instead of code causing KeyNotFoundException
// caller has no idea what key is missing
// attribute implementation skips null values so it should also skip validation if the key is not found?
// either way the Exception should be handled and return correct message and status code
MockWebContext ctx = new MockWebContext();
ctx.ActionArguments.Add("code", "1234567-8");
var actExeContext = ctx.CreateActionExecutingContext();
ValidateRegExAttribute attr = new ValidateRegExAttribute("notfoundkeyname", @"^[0-9]{7}-[0-9]{1}$");
attr.OnActionExecuting(actExeContext);
// if everything is ok the status is not changed so default 0 value is the expected value and not http 200
actExeContext.HttpContext.Response.StatusCode.Should().Be((int)HttpStatusCode.BadRequest);
}
