public override IToken RecoverInline(Parser recognizer)
{
// SINGLE TOKEN DELETION
IToken matchedSymbol = SingleTokenDeletion(recognizer);
if (matchedSymbol != null)
{
// we have deleted the extra token.
// now, move past ttype token as if all were ok
////Console.WriteLine("2Consuming: " + recognizer.CurrentToken.Text);
////recognizer.Consume();
IntervalSet expecting = recognizer.GetExpectedTokens();
IntervalSet whatFollowsLoopIterationOrRule = expecting.Or(GetErrorRecoverySet(recognizer));
Console.WriteLine("From Recover");
ConsumeUntil(recognizer, whatFollowsLoopIterationOrRule);
return(matchedSymbol);
}
// SINGLE TOKEN INSERTION
if (SingleTokenInsertion(recognizer))
{
return(GetMissingSymbol(recognizer));
}
// even that didn't work; must throw the exception
throw new InputMismatchException(recognizer);
}
/// <summary>
/// The default implementation of
/// <see cref="IAntlrErrorStrategy.Sync(Parser)">IAntlrErrorStrategy.Sync(Parser)</see>
/// makes sure
/// that the current lookahead symbol is consistent with what were expecting
/// at this point in the ATN. You can call this anytime but ANTLR only
/// generates code to check before subrules/loops and each iteration.
/// <p/>
/// Implements Jim Idle's magic sync mechanism in closures and optional
/// subrules. E.g.,
/// <pre>
/// a : sync ( stuff sync )* ;
/// sync : {consume to what can follow sync} ;
/// </pre>
/// At the start of a sub rule upon error,
/// <see cref="Sync(Parser)">Sync(Parser)</see>
/// performs single
/// token deletion, if possible. If it can't do that, it bails on the current
/// rule and uses the default error recovery, which consumes until the
/// resynchronization set of the current rule.
/// <p/>
/// If the sub rule is optional (
/// <code>(...)?</code>
/// ,
/// <code>(...)*</code>
/// , or block
/// with an empty alternative), then the expected set includes what follows
/// the subrule.
/// <p/>
/// During loop iteration, it consumes until it sees a token that can start a
/// sub rule or what follows loop. Yes, that is pretty aggressive. We opt to
/// stay in the loop as long as possible.
/// <p/>
/// <strong>ORIGINS</strong>
/// <p/>
/// Previous versions of ANTLR did a poor job of their recovery within loops.
/// A single mismatch token or missing token would force the parser to bail
/// out of the entire rules surrounding the loop. So, for rule
/// <pre>
/// classDef : 'class' ID '{' member* '}'
/// </pre>
/// input with an extra token between members would force the parser to
/// consume until it found the next class definition rather than the next
/// member definition of the current class.
/// <p/>
/// This functionality cost a little bit of effort because the parser has to
/// compare token set at the start of the loop and at each iteration. If for
/// some reason speed is suffering for you, you can turn off this
/// functionality by simply overriding this method as a blank { }.
/// </summary>
/// <exception cref="Antlr4.Runtime.RecognitionException"></exception>
public virtual void Sync(Parser recognizer)
{
ATNState s = recognizer.Interpreter.atn.states[recognizer.State];
// System.err.println("sync @ "+s.stateNumber+"="+s.getClass().getSimpleName());
// If already recovering, don't try to sync
if (InErrorRecoveryMode(recognizer))
{
return;
}
ITokenStream tokens = ((ITokenStream)recognizer.InputStream);
int la = tokens.La(1);
// try cheaper subset first; might get lucky. seems to shave a wee bit off
if (recognizer.Atn.NextTokens(s).Contains(la) || la == TokenConstants.Eof)
{
return;
}
// Return but don't end recovery. only do that upon valid token match
if (recognizer.IsExpectedToken(la))
{
return;
}
switch (s.StateType)
{
case StateType.BlockStart:
case StateType.StarBlockStart:
case StateType.PlusBlockStart:
case StateType.StarLoopEntry:
{
// report error and recover if possible
if (SingleTokenDeletion(recognizer) != null)
{
return;
}
throw new InputMismatchException(recognizer);
}
case StateType.PlusLoopBack:
case StateType.StarLoopBack:
{
// System.err.println("at loop back: "+s.getClass().getSimpleName());
ReportUnwantedToken(recognizer);
IntervalSet expecting = recognizer.GetExpectedTokens();
IntervalSet whatFollowsLoopIterationOrRule = expecting.Or(GetErrorRecoverySet(recognizer
));
ConsumeUntil(recognizer, whatFollowsLoopIterationOrRule);
break;
}
default:
{
// do nothing if we can't identify the exact kind of ATN state
break;
}
}
}
public override void Sync(Parser recognizer)
{
//Console.WriteLine("\t" + recognizer.CurrentToken.Text);
ATNState s = recognizer.Interpreter.atn.states[recognizer.State];
// System.err.println("sync @ "+s.stateNumber+"="+s.getClass().getSimpleName());
// If already recovering, don't try to sync
if (InErrorRecoveryMode(recognizer))
{
return;
}
ITokenStream tokens = ((ITokenStream)recognizer.InputStream);
int la = tokens.La(1);
// try cheaper subset first; might get lucky. seems to shave a wee bit off
var nextTokens = recognizer.Atn.NextTokens(s);
if (nextTokens.Contains(TokenConstants.Epsilon) || nextTokens.Contains(la))
{
return;
}
switch (s.StateType)
{
case StateType.BlockStart:
case StateType.StarBlockStart:
case StateType.PlusBlockStart:
case StateType.StarLoopEntry: /*{ No special treatment for the first token
* // report error and recover if possible
* if (SingleTokenDeletion(recognizer) != null) {
* return;
* }
* throw new InputMismatchException(recognizer);
* }*/
case StateType.PlusLoopBack:
case StateType.StarLoopBack: {
// System.err.println("at loop back: "+s.getClass().getSimpleName());
//ReportUnwantedToken(recognizer);
IntervalSet expecting = recognizer.GetExpectedTokens();
IntervalSet whatFollowsLoopIterationOrRule = expecting.Or(GetErrorRecoverySet(recognizer));
ConsumeUntil(recognizer, expecting);
break;
}
default: {
// do nothing if we can't identify the exact kind of ATN state
break;
}
}
}
/// <summary>
/// The default implementation of
/// <see cref="IAntlrErrorStrategy.Sync(Parser)"/>
/// makes sure
/// that the current lookahead symbol is consistent with what were expecting
/// at this point in the ATN. You can call this anytime but ANTLR only
/// generates code to check before subrules/loops and each iteration.
/// <p>Implements Jim Idle's magic sync mechanism in closures and optional
/// subrules. E.g.,</p>
/// <pre>
/// a : sync ( stuff sync )* ;
/// sync : {consume to what can follow sync} ;
/// </pre>
/// At the start of a sub rule upon error,
/// <see cref="Sync(Parser)"/>
/// performs single
/// token deletion, if possible. If it can't do that, it bails on the current
/// rule and uses the default error recovery, which consumes until the
/// resynchronization set of the current rule.
/// <p>If the sub rule is optional (
/// <c>(...)?</c>
/// ,
/// <c>(...)*</c>
/// , or block
/// with an empty alternative), then the expected set includes what follows
/// the subrule.</p>
/// <p>During loop iteration, it consumes until it sees a token that can start a
/// sub rule or what follows loop. Yes, that is pretty aggressive. We opt to
/// stay in the loop as long as possible.</p>
/// <p><strong>ORIGINS</strong></p>
/// <p>Previous versions of ANTLR did a poor job of their recovery within loops.
/// A single mismatch token or missing token would force the parser to bail
/// out of the entire rules surrounding the loop. So, for rule</p>
/// <pre>
/// classDef : 'class' ID '{' member* '}'
/// </pre>
/// input with an extra token between members would force the parser to
/// consume until it found the next class definition rather than the next
/// member definition of the current class.
/// <p>This functionality cost a little bit of effort because the parser has to
/// compare token set at the start of the loop and at each iteration. If for
/// some reason speed is suffering for you, you can turn off this
/// functionality by simply overriding this method as a blank { }.</p>
/// </summary>
/// <exception cref="Antlr4.Runtime.RecognitionException"/>
public virtual void Sync(Parser recognizer)
{
ATNState s = recognizer.Interpreter.atn.states[recognizer.State];
// System.err.println("sync @ "+s.stateNumber+"="+s.getClass().getSimpleName());
// If already recovering, don't try to sync
if (InErrorRecoveryMode(recognizer))
{
return;
}
ITokenStream tokens = ((ITokenStream)recognizer.InputStream);
int la = tokens.LA(1);
// try cheaper subset first; might get lucky. seems to shave a wee bit off
var nextTokens = recognizer.Atn.NextTokens(s);
if (nextTokens.Contains(la))
{
nextTokensContext = null;
nextTokensState = ATNState.InvalidStateNumber;
return;
}
if (nextTokens.Contains(TokenConstants.EPSILON))
{
if (nextTokensContext == null)
{
// It's possible the next token won't match; information tracked
// by sync is restricted for performance.
nextTokensContext = recognizer.Context;
nextTokensState = recognizer.State;
}
return;
}
switch (s.StateType)
{
case StateType.BlockStart:
case StateType.StarBlockStart:
case StateType.PlusBlockStart:
case StateType.StarLoopEntry:
{
// report error and recover if possible
if (SingleTokenDeletion(recognizer) != null)
{
return;
}
throw new InputMismatchException(recognizer);
}
case StateType.PlusLoopBack:
case StateType.StarLoopBack:
{
// System.err.println("at loop back: "+s.getClass().getSimpleName());
ReportUnwantedToken(recognizer);
IntervalSet expecting = recognizer.GetExpectedTokens();
IntervalSet whatFollowsLoopIterationOrRule = expecting.Or(GetErrorRecoverySet(recognizer));
ConsumeUntil(recognizer, whatFollowsLoopIterationOrRule);
break;
}
default:
{
// do nothing if we can't identify the exact kind of ATN state
break;
}
}
}