private BoundNode RewriteDelegateOperation(BoundBinaryOperator node, SpecialMember member)
{
Debug.Assert(node != null);
var method = (MethodSymbol)this.compilation.Assembly.GetSpecialTypeMember(member);
// UNDONE: Handle the bizarre error case where we don't have the expected methods.
Debug.Assert(method != null);
BoundExpression call = BoundCall.SynthesizedCall(null, method, node.Left, node.Right);
BoundExpression result = method.ReturnType.SpecialType == SpecialType.System_Delegate ?
BoundConversion.SynthesizedConversion(call, ConversionKind.ExplicitReference, node.Type) :
call;
return(Visit(result));
}
public override BoundNode VisitCompoundAssignmentOperator(BoundCompoundAssignmentOperator node)
{
if (node.HasErrors)
{
return(node);
}
// There are five possible cases.
//
// Case 1: receiver.Prop += value is transformed into
// temp = receiver
// temp.Prop = temp.Prop + value
// and a later rewriting will turn that into calls to getters and setters.
//
// Case 2: collection[i1, i2, i3] += value is transformed into
// tc = collection
// t1 = i1
// t2 = i2
// t3 = i3
// tc[t1, t2, t3] = tc[t1, t2, t3] + value
// and again, a later rewriting will turn that into getters and setters of the indexer.
//
// Case 3: local += value (and param += value) needs no temporaries; it simply
// becomes local = local + value.
//
// Case 4: staticField += value needs no temporaries either. However, classInst.field += value becomes
// temp = classInst
// temp.field = temp.field + value
//
// Case 5: otherwise, it must be structVariable.field += value or array[index] += value. Either way
// we have a variable on the left. Transform it into:
// ref temp = ref variable
// temp = temp + value
var temps = ArrayBuilder <LocalSymbol> .GetInstance();
var stores = ArrayBuilder <BoundExpression> .GetInstance();
// This will be filled in with the LHS that uses temporaries to prevent
// double-evaluation of side effects.
BoundExpression transformedLHS = null;
if (node.Left.Kind == BoundKind.PropertyAccess)
{
// We need to stash away the receiver so that it does not get evaluated twice.
// If the receiver is classified as a value of reference type then we can simply say
//
// R temp = receiver
// temp.prop = temp.prop + rhs
//
// But if the receiver is classified as a variable of struct type then we
// cannot make a copy of the value; we need to make sure that we mutate
// the original receiver, not the copy. We have to generate
//
// ref R temp = ref receiver
// temp.prop = temp.prop + rhs
//
// The rules of C# (in section 7.17.1) require that if you have receiver.prop
// as the target of an assignment such that receiver is a value type, it must
// be classified as a variable. If we've gotten this far in the rewriting,
// assume that was the case.
var prop = (BoundPropertyAccess)node.Left;
// If the property is static then we can just generate prop = prop + value
if (prop.ReceiverOpt == null)
{
transformedLHS = prop;
}
else
{
// Can we ever avoid storing the receiver in a temp? If the receiver is a variable then it
// might be modified by the computation of the getter, the value, or the operation.
// The receiver cannot be a null constant or constant of value type. It could be a
// constant of string type, but there are no mutable properties of a string.
// Similarly, there are no mutable properties of a Type object, so the receiver
// cannot be a typeof(T) expression. The only situation I can think of where we could
// optimize away the temp is if the receiver is a readonly field of reference type,
// we are not in a constructor, and the receiver of the *field*, if any, is also idempotent.
// It doesn't seem worthwhile to pursue an optimization for this exceedingly rare case.
var rewrittenReceiver = (BoundExpression)Visit(prop.ReceiverOpt);
var receiverTemp = TempHelpers.StoreToTemp(rewrittenReceiver, rewrittenReceiver.Type.IsValueType ? RefKind.Ref : RefKind.None, containingSymbol);
stores.Add(receiverTemp.Item1);
temps.Add(receiverTemp.Item2.LocalSymbol);
transformedLHS = new BoundPropertyAccess(prop.Syntax, prop.SyntaxTree, receiverTemp.Item2, prop.PropertySymbol, prop.Type);
}
}
else if (node.Left.Kind == BoundKind.IndexerAccess)
{
var indexer = (BoundIndexerAccess)node.Left;
BoundExpression transformedReceiver = null;
if (indexer.ReceiverOpt != null)
{
var rewrittenReceiver = (BoundExpression)Visit(indexer.ReceiverOpt);
var receiverTemp = TempHelpers.StoreToTemp(rewrittenReceiver, rewrittenReceiver.Type.IsValueType ? RefKind.Ref : RefKind.None, containingSymbol);
transformedReceiver = receiverTemp.Item2;
stores.Add(receiverTemp.Item1);
temps.Add(receiverTemp.Item2.LocalSymbol);
}
// UNDONE: Dealing with the arguments is a bit tricky because they can be named out-of-order arguments;
// UNDONE: we have to preserve both the source-code order of the side effects and the side effects
// UNDONE: only being executed once.
// UNDONE:
// UNDONE: This is a subtly different problem than the problem faced by the conventional call
// UNDONE: rewriter; with the conventional call rewriter we already know that the side effects
// UNDONE: will only be executed once because the arguments are only being pushed on the stack once.
// UNDONE: In a compound equality operator on an indexer the indices are placed on the stack twice.
// UNDONE: That is to say, if you have:
// UNDONE:
// UNDONE: C().M(z : Z(), x : X(), y : Y())
// UNDONE:
// UNDONE: then we can rewrite that into
// UNDONE:
// UNDONE: tempc = C()
// UNDONE: tempz = Z()
// UNDONE: tempc.M(X(), Y(), tempz)
// UNDONE:
// UNDONE: See, we can optimize away two of the temporaries, for x and y. But we cannot optimize away any of the
// UNDONE: temporaries in
// UNDONE:
// UNDONE: C().Collection[z : Z(), x : X(), y : Y()] += 1;
// UNDONE:
// UNDONE: because we have to ensure not just that Z() happens first, but in additioan that X() and Y() are only
// UNDONE: called once. We have to generate this as
// UNDONE:
// UNDONE: tempc = C().Collection
// UNDONE: tempz = Z()
// UNDONE: tempx = X()
// UNDONE: tempy = Y()
// UNDONE: tempc[tempx, tempy, tempz] = tempc[tempx, tempy, tempz] + 1;
// UNDONE:
// UNDONE: Fortunately arguments to indexers are never ref or out, so we don't need to worry about that.
// UNDONE: However, we can still do the optimization where constants are not stored in
// UNDONE: temporaries; if we have
// UNDONE:
// UNDONE: C().Collection[z : 123, y : Y(), x : X()] += 1;
// UNDONE:
// UNDONE: Then we can generate that as
// UNDONE:
// UNDONE: tempc = C().Collection
// UNDONE: tempx = X()
// UNDONE: tempy = Y()
// UNDONE: tempc[tempx, tempy, 123] = tempc[tempx, tempy, 123] + 1;
// UNDONE:
// UNDONE: For now, we'll punt on both problems, as indexers are not implemented yet anyway.
// UNDONE: We'll just generate one temporary for each argument. This will work, but in the
// UNDONE: subsequent rewritings will generate more unnecessary temporaries.
var transformedArguments = ArrayBuilder <BoundExpression> .GetInstance();
foreach (var argument in indexer.Arguments)
{
var rewrittenArgument = (BoundExpression)Visit(argument);
var argumentTemp = TempHelpers.StoreToTemp(rewrittenArgument, RefKind.None, containingSymbol);
transformedArguments.Add(argumentTemp.Item2);
stores.Add(argumentTemp.Item1);
temps.Add(argumentTemp.Item2.LocalSymbol);
}
transformedLHS = new BoundIndexerAccess(indexer.Syntax, indexer.SyntaxTree, transformedArguments.ToReadOnlyAndFree(), transformedReceiver,
indexer.IndexerSymbol, indexer.Type);
}
else if (node.Left.Kind == BoundKind.Local || node.Left.Kind == BoundKind.Parameter)
{
// No temporaries are needed. Just generate local = local + value
transformedLHS = node.Left;
}
else if (node.Left.Kind == BoundKind.FieldAccess)
{
// * If the field is static then no temporaries are needed.
// * If the field is not static and the receiver is of reference type then generate t = r; t.f = t.f + value
// * If the field is not static and the receiver is a variable of value type then we'll fall into the
// general variable case below.
var fieldAccess = (BoundFieldAccess)node.Left;
if (fieldAccess.ReceiverOpt == null)
{
transformedLHS = fieldAccess;
}
else if (!fieldAccess.ReceiverOpt.Type.IsValueType)
{
var rewrittenReceiver = (BoundExpression)Visit(fieldAccess.ReceiverOpt);
var receiverTemp = TempHelpers.StoreToTemp(rewrittenReceiver, RefKind.None, containingSymbol);
stores.Add(receiverTemp.Item1);
temps.Add(receiverTemp.Item2.LocalSymbol);
transformedLHS = new BoundFieldAccess(fieldAccess.Syntax, fieldAccess.SyntaxTree, receiverTemp.Item2, fieldAccess.FieldSymbol, null);
}
}
if (transformedLHS == null)
{
// We made no transformation above. Either we have array[index] += value or
// structVariable.field += value; either way we have a potentially complicated variable-
// producing expression on the left. Generate
// ref temp = ref variable; temp = temp + value
var rewrittenVariable = (BoundExpression)Visit(node.Left);
var variableTemp = TempHelpers.StoreToTemp(rewrittenVariable, RefKind.Ref, containingSymbol);
stores.Add(variableTemp.Item1);
temps.Add(variableTemp.Item2.LocalSymbol);
transformedLHS = variableTemp.Item2;
}
// OK, we now have the temporary declarations, the temporary stores, and the transformed left hand side.
// We need to generate
//
// xlhs = (FINAL)((LEFT)xlhs op rhs)
//
// And then wrap it up with the generated temporaries.
//
// (The right hand side has already been converted to the type expected by the operator.)
BoundExpression opLHS = BoundConversion.SynthesizedConversion(transformedLHS, node.LeftConversion, node.Operator.LeftType);
Debug.Assert(node.Right.Type == node.Operator.RightType);
BoundExpression op = new BoundBinaryOperator(null, null, node.Operator.Kind, opLHS, node.Right, null, node.Operator.ReturnType);
BoundExpression opFinal = BoundConversion.SynthesizedConversion(op, node.FinalConversion, node.Left.Type);
BoundExpression assignment = new BoundAssignmentOperator(null, null, transformedLHS, opFinal, node.Left.Type);
// OK, at this point we have:
//
// * temps evaluating and storing portions of the LHS that must be evaluated only once.
// * the "transformed" left hand side, rebuilt to use temps where necessary
// * the assignment "xlhs = (FINAL)((LEFT)xlhs op (RIGHT)rhs)"
//
// Notice that we have recursively rewritten the bound nodes that are things stored in
// the temps, but we might have more rewriting to do on the assignment. There are three
// conversions in there that might be lowered to method calls, an operator that might
// be lowered to delegate combine, string concat, and so on, and don't forget, we
// haven't lowered the right hand side at all! Let's rewrite all these things at once.
BoundExpression rewrittenAssignment = (BoundExpression)Visit(assignment);
BoundExpression result = (temps.Count == 0) ?
rewrittenAssignment :
new BoundSequence(null,
null,
temps.ToReadOnly(),
stores.ToReadOnly(),
rewrittenAssignment,
rewrittenAssignment.Type);
temps.Free();
stores.Free();
return(result);
}