void AnnounceInsideFactory(CarProduced theEvent)
{
// TODO: Reduce the Inventory of parts that were just used
// TODO: But the whole inventory system needs to be revamped I think :)
// Rule: an employee can only build one car a day
// so remember who just did it
EmployeesWhoHaveProducedACarToday.Add(theEvent.EmployeeName);
}
void AnnounceInsideFactory(CarProduced theEvent)
{
// TODO: Reduce the Inventory of parts that were just used
// TODO: But the whole inventory system needs to be revamped I think :)
// Rule: an employee can only build one car a day
// so remember who just did it
EmployeesWhoHaveProducedACarToday.Add(theEvent.EmployeeName);
}
void AnnounceInsideFactory(CarProduced theEvent)
{
// Reduce the Inventory of parts that were just used to ProduceACar
// There is a better way to not repeat the hard-coded Model T parts needed but leave it for now
if (theEvent.CarModel == "Model T")
{
// Parts Needed To Build a Model T
// 6 wheels
// 1 engine
// 2 sets of "bits and pieces
// Reduce Parts Stock Inventory by that Amount
int currentItemQuantity = 0;
// TODO: Rinat, This is atomic and safe right? I think yes because of Factory Agg boundary but...??
// TODO: Negative inventory concerns, check on eventually consistent stuff.
if (InventoryOfPartsOnShelf.TryGetValue("wheels", out currentItemQuantity))
{
InventoryOfPartsOnShelf["wheels"] = currentItemQuantity - 6;
}
currentItemQuantity = 0;
if (InventoryOfPartsOnShelf.TryGetValue("engine", out currentItemQuantity))
{
InventoryOfPartsOnShelf["engine"] = currentItemQuantity - 1;
}
currentItemQuantity = 0;
if (InventoryOfPartsOnShelf.TryGetValue("bits and pieces", out currentItemQuantity))
{
InventoryOfPartsOnShelf["bits and pieces"] = currentItemQuantity - 2;
}
}
// Rule: an employee can only produce one car per day
// so remember who just did it
EmployeesWhoHaveProducedACarToday.Add(theEvent.EmployeeName);
}
