public static void UpdateRule(string name, Windows.Models.Rule updatedRule)
{
Policy policy = new Policy();
var locatedRule = policy.Rules.FirstOrDefault(r => r.Name == name);
if (locatedRule == null)
{
throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(name), "No rule with that name exists");
}
/// See <see cref="FirewallAPI.Rule"/> for description of native type
locatedRule.Name = updatedRule.Name;
locatedRule.Action = (FirewallAPI.Action)updatedRule.Action;
locatedRule.Protocol = (int)updatedRule.Protocol;
locatedRule.Direction = (FirewallAPI.RuleDirection)updatedRule.Direction;
locatedRule.LocalAddresses = updatedRule.LocalAddresses;
locatedRule.LocalPorts = updatedRule.LocalPorts;
locatedRule.RemoteAddresses = updatedRule.RemoteAddresses;
locatedRule.RemotePorts = updatedRule.RemotePorts;
}
public static void NewRule(Windows.Models.Rule rule)
{
// There is currently no strongly typed way to do this with
// the firewall API developed. FirewallAPI.Rule is backed by
// a COM type which will commit immediately. As such, the individual
// properties are past instead.
// TODO: Windows Firewall mapping: This is a bit of a dirty way to do the mapping
FirewallAPI.Action action = (FirewallAPI.Action)rule.Action;
int protocol = (int)rule.Protocol;
FirewallAPI.RuleDirection direction = (FirewallAPI.RuleDirection)rule.Direction;
Policy policy = new Policy();
policy.Rules.Add(rule.Name, action, protocol, direction,
rule.LocalAddresses, rule.LocalPorts, rule.RemoteAddresses, rule.RemotePorts);
//NewRuleFirewallClient.Execute(rule.Name, (int) rule.Protocol, rule.LocalPorts, action);
}
