static void Main(string[] args)
{
ICookingStrategy cookingStrategy = new WellDoneStrategy();
IMeat steak = new Steak(cookingStrategy);
Console.WriteLine($"Currently the steak is {steak.State()}");
Console.WriteLine("Cooking...");
steak.Cook();
Console.WriteLine($"The steak is now cooked and it is {steak.State()}");
Console.WriteLine();
}
public void EatFood()
{
// We've coupled ourselves to the Console implementation
Console.WriteLine("I'm hungry, what do we have to eat? ");
string food = Console.ReadLine();
// We are newing classes here too!
if (food == "orange")
{
var orange = new Orange();
orange.Peel();
orange.Eat();
}
else if (food == "steak")
{
var steak = new Steak();
steak.Cook();
steak.Eat();
}
//
// Adding more types of foods means we need to add more conditional blocks and we need to know how to eat the pie too
// This class can get complex and large fast if we don't invert the control of creating the food
// We will also need to abstract how to eat food so we can invert the control of how to eat food to each food type
//
// Now what if we need a stomach class to know all of these types of food too?
// For every type of food, we would need to now touch two classes as well as more code branches which grows the complexity further
// Coding to abstractions (interfaces) and inverting control will make these classes easier to manage and evolve
//
else if (food == "apple pie")
{
var pie = new ApplePie();
pie.Warm();
pie.Eat();
}
else
{
Console.WriteLine("I don't know how to eat " + food);
return;
}
Console.WriteLine("Thanks, that was good");
}
public void Execute()
{
_steak.Cook();
_iscompleted = true;
}