public void Use(BaseGameEntity target, Transform origin)
{
if (!System.Object.ReferenceEquals(null, CurWeapon) &&
CurWeapon.IsReady())
{
CurWeapon.Use(target, origin);
}
}
public void Use(Vector3 pos, Vector3 dir)
{
if (!System.Object.ReferenceEquals(null, CurWeapon) &&
CurWeapon.IsReady())
{
CurWeapon.Use(pos, dir, Owner);
}
}
public void Use(BaseGameEntity target)
{
if (!System.Object.ReferenceEquals(null, CurWeapon) &&
CurWeapon.IsReady())
{
CurWeapon.Use(target, Owner);
}
}
//role驱动行为树更合适，行为树仅提供决策，大部分逻辑仍在role中完成??
public virtual void Update(float dt)
{
if (IsDead)
{
return;
}
StateUpdate();
CurWeapon.Update(dt);
BehaviorDesigner.Runtime.BehaviorManager.instance.Tick(Controller.tree);//决策放在逻辑帧的最后??
//应该在Tick中call update，而不是update call tick??
}
protected void InitWeapon()//
{
CurWeapon.Init();
Status = PushState(0);
//CurWeapon.GetCombos();
}