public String sense_permission_denyPermission(PairParamaters q, int politeness, AdjacencyPair.Preferredness preferredness)
{
return(sense_request_denyRequest(q, politeness, preferredness));
}//end sense_grant_request
}//end sense_grant_permission
/*SENSE RESPOND TO permission request - DENY PERMISSION
* takes paramater preferred response, designating whether the interlocutor would find this outcome disirable or not
*
* Basically just two big politeness switch statements, one for prefferred and one for disprefferred
* desirable responses are more emphatic and positive
* undesirable responses are more apologetic
*
* example output
* no of course not
*
* NOTE its expected that preferredness will usually be negative
* in fact positive preferredness has only one response: 'no.'
*/
//overload allows overriding default politeness
public String sense_request_denyPermission(PairParamaters q, AdjacencyPair.Preferredness preferredness)
{
return(sense_permission_denyPermission(q, 6, preferredness));//default politeness 6
}
public String sense_permission_grantPermission(PairParamaters q, int politeness, AdjacencyPair.Preferredness preferredness)
{
String output = "";
String punctuation = ".";
String yes = "yes";
String end_fragment = "of course ";
/*go through all permutations of preferedness and register*/
/*changes based on register
* formal register yes = "certainly"
* casual register yes = "yes"
* intimate register yes = "yeah"
*/
//NOTE disprefered end_fragments are dealt with later since theyre so unlikely
if (conversationalParamaters.registerType == ConversationalParamaters.RegisterType.formal_register)
{
yes = "certainly ";
end_fragment = "go ahead";
}
else if (conversationalParamaters.registerType == ConversationalParamaters.RegisterType.intimate_register)
{
yes = "yeah ";
end_fragment = "no worries";
}
/*end going through preferredness and register*/
//first check input is within bounds
if (politeness < 1)
{
politeness = 1;
}
if (politeness > 10)
{
politeness = 10;
}
switch (politeness)
{
case 1:
output = yes;
end_fragment = "";
break;
case 2:
output = yes;
end_fragment = "";
break;
case 3:
output = yes + ", that's ok";
end_fragment = "";
break;
case 4:
output = yes + "," + end_fragment;
break;
case 5:
output = yes + "," + end_fragment;
break;
case 6:
output = yes + "," + end_fragment;
break;
case 7:
output = yes + ", " + end_fragment + q.initiatingSpeaker.name(q.respondingSpeaker) + "no problem, please do";
break;
case 8:
output = yes + ", " + end_fragment + q.initiatingSpeaker.name(q.respondingSpeaker) + "no problem, please do";
break;
case 9:
output = yes + ", " + end_fragment + q.initiatingSpeaker.name(q.respondingSpeaker) + ", no problem at all";
break;
case 10:
output = yes + ", " + end_fragment + q.initiatingSpeaker.name(q.respondingSpeaker) + ", no problem at all";
break;
default:
output = "POLITENESS VALUE ERROR: MUST BE BETWEEN 0 AND 10";
break;
}
//dispreferred outcome
//it wont happen very often that an accepted request is a dispreferred option
if (preferredness == AdjacencyPair.Preferredness.dispreferred || preferredness == AdjacencyPair.Preferredness.strongly_dispreferred)
{
switch (politeness)
{
case 1:
output = "yes";
punctuation = "!";
break;
case 2:
output = "yes";
break;
case 3:
output = "yes, sorry";
break;
case 4:
output = "yes, sorry";
break;
case 5:
output = "yes, unfortunately";
break;
case 6:
output = "yes, I'm afraid so";
break;
case 7:
output = "yes, I'm afraid so, " + q.initiatingSpeaker.name(q.respondingSpeaker);
break;
case 8:
output = "yes, I'm afraid so, " + q.initiatingSpeaker.name(q.respondingSpeaker) + ", I'm very sorry";
break;
case 9:
output = "yes, I'm afraid so, " + q.initiatingSpeaker.name(q.respondingSpeaker) + ", I'm really sorry";
punctuation = "!";
break;
case 10:
output = "yes, I'm afraid so, " + q.initiatingSpeaker.name(q.respondingSpeaker) + ", I'm extremely sorry";
punctuation = "!";
break;
default:
output = "POLITENESS VALUE ERROR: MUST BE BETWEEN 0 AND 10";
break;
}
}
/*ASSEMBLE*/
return(formatOutput(output) + punctuation);
}//end sense_grant_permission
public String sense_request_denyRequest(PairParamaters q, int politeness, AdjacencyPair.Preferredness preferredness)
{
String output = "";
String punctuation = ".";
//first check input is within bounds
if (politeness < 1)
{
politeness = 1;
}
if (politeness > 10)
{
politeness = 10;
}
switch (politeness)
{
case 1:
output = "no";
punctuation = "!";
break;
case 2:
output = "no";
break;
case 3:
output = "no, sorry";
break;
case 4:
output = "no, sorry";
break;
case 5:
output = "sorry, no";
break;
case 6:
output = "I'm afraid not, no";
break;
case 7:
output = "I'm afraid not, " + q.initiatingSpeaker.name(q.respondingSpeaker) + ", I'm very sorry";
break;
case 8:
output = "I'm sorry, " + q.initiatingSpeaker.name(q.respondingSpeaker) + ", I'm afraid not";
break;
case 9:
output = "I'm sorry, " + q.initiatingSpeaker.name(q.respondingSpeaker) + ", I'm afraid not. I'm very sorry";
break;
case 10:
output = "I'm sorry, " + q.initiatingSpeaker.name(q.respondingSpeaker) + ", I'm afraid not. I'm truly very sorry";
break;
default:
output = "POLITENESS VALUE ERROR: MUST BE BETWEEN 0 AND 10";
break;
}
//prefferred outcome
//it wont happen very often that a denied request is a preferred option
if (preferredness == AdjacencyPair.Preferredness.preferred || preferredness == AdjacencyPair.Preferredness.strongly_preferred)
{
output = "no";
}
/*ASSEMBLE*/
output += punctuation;
return(formatOutput(output));
}//end sense_grant_request
public String sense_request_grantRequest(PairParamaters q, int politeness, AdjacencyPair.Preferredness preferredness)
{
String output = "";
String punctuation = ".";
/*the only effect positive preferredness has is to boost the politeness slightly
* my theory is that this will make the response sound more emphatic*/
if (preferredness == AdjacencyPair.Preferredness.preferred)
{
politeness++;
}
else if (preferredness == AdjacencyPair.Preferredness.strongly_preferred)
{
politeness += 2;
}
//first check input is within bounds
if (politeness < 1)
{
politeness = 1;
}
if (politeness > 10)
{
politeness = 10;
}
switch (politeness)
{
case 1:
output = "yes ";
break;
case 2:
output = "yes. ok";
break;
case 3:
output = "yes, that's ok";
break;
case 4:
output = "yes, no problem";
break;
case 5:
output = "yes, of course";
break;
case 6:
output = "yes, of course, please do";
break;
case 7:
output = "yes, of course, " + q.initiatingSpeaker.name(q.respondingSpeaker) + "no problem, please do";
break;
case 8:
output = "yes, of course, " + q.initiatingSpeaker.name(q.respondingSpeaker) + "no problem, please do";
punctuation = "!";
break;
case 9:
output = "yes, of course! Please do, " + q.initiatingSpeaker.name(q.respondingSpeaker) + ", no problem at all";
punctuation = ".";
break;
case 10:
output = "yes, of course! Please do, " + q.initiatingSpeaker.name(q.respondingSpeaker) + ", no problem at all";
punctuation = ".";
break;
default:
output = "POLITENESS VALUE ERROR: MUST BE BETWEEN 0 AND 10";
break;
}
//dispreferred outcome
//it wont happen very often that an accepted request is a dispreferred option
if (preferredness == AdjacencyPair.Preferredness.dispreferred || preferredness == AdjacencyPair.Preferredness.strongly_dispreferred)
{
switch (politeness)
{
case 1:
output = "yes";
punctuation = "!";
break;
case 2:
output = "yes";
break;
case 3:
output = "yes, sorry";
break;
case 4:
output = "yes, sorry";
break;
case 5:
output = "yes, unfortunately";
break;
case 6:
output = "yes, I'm afraid so";
break;
case 7:
output = "yes, I'm afraid so, " + q.initiatingSpeaker.name(q.respondingSpeaker);
break;
case 8:
output = "yes, I'm afraid so, " + q.initiatingSpeaker.name(q.respondingSpeaker) + ", I'm very sorry";
break;
case 9:
output = "yes, I'm afraid so, " + q.initiatingSpeaker.name(q.respondingSpeaker) + ", I'm really sorry";
punctuation = "!";
break;
case 10:
output = "yes, I'm afraid so, " + q.initiatingSpeaker.name(q.respondingSpeaker) + ", I'm extremely sorry";
punctuation = "!";
break;
default:
output = "POLITENESS VALUE ERROR: MUST BE BETWEEN 0 AND 10";
break;
}
}
/*ASSEMBLE*/
//two production rules because the order changes slightly with the highest politeness levels
output += punctuation;
return(formatOutput(output));
}//end sense_grant_request
/*SENSE RESPOND TO REQUEST - GRANT REQUEST
* takes paramater preferred response, designating whether the interlocutor would find this outcome disirable or not
*
* Basically just two big politeness switch statements, one for prefferred and one for disprefferred
* desirable responses are more emphatic and positive
* undesirable responses are more apologetic
*
* example output
* yes of course
* yes of course you/I can
* yes of course you/I can VERB
*/
//overload allows overriding default politeness
public String sense_request_grantRequest(PairParamaters q, AdjacencyPair.Preferredness preferredness)
{
return(sense_request_grantRequest(q, 6, preferredness));//default politeness 6
}
