/// <summary> Internal helper method used by check that iterates over
/// valMismatchKeys and generates a Collection of Insanity
/// instances accordingly. The MapOfSets are used to populate
/// the Insantiy objects.
/// </summary>
/// <seealso cref="InsanityType.VALUEMISMATCH">
/// </seealso>
private List <Insanity> CheckValueMismatch(MapOfSets <int, CacheEntry> valIdToItems, MapOfSets <ReaderField, int> readerFieldToValIds, Dictionary <ReaderField, ReaderField> valMismatchKeys)
{
List <Insanity> insanity = new List <Insanity>(valMismatchKeys.Count * 3);
if (!(valMismatchKeys.Count == 0))
{
// we have multiple values for some ReaderFields
IDictionary <ReaderField, Dictionary <int, int> > rfMap = readerFieldToValIds.GetMap();
IDictionary <int, Dictionary <CacheEntry, CacheEntry> > valMap = valIdToItems.GetMap();
foreach (ReaderField rf in valMismatchKeys.Keys)
{
List <CacheEntry> badEntries = new List <CacheEntry>(valMismatchKeys.Count * 2);
foreach (int val in rfMap[rf].Keys)
{
foreach (CacheEntry entry in valMap[val].Keys)
{
badEntries.Add(entry);
}
}
insanity.Add(new Insanity(InsanityType.VALUEMISMATCH, "Multiple distinct value objects for " + rf.ToString(), badEntries.ToArray()));
}
}
return(insanity);
}
/// <summary> Tests a CacheEntry[] for indication of "insane" cache usage.
/// <p/>
/// NOTE:FieldCache CreationPlaceholder objects are ignored.
/// (:TODO: is this a bad idea? are we masking a real problem?)
/// <p/>
/// </summary>
public Insanity[] Check(CacheEntry[] cacheEntries)
{
if (null == cacheEntries || 0 == cacheEntries.Length)
{
return(new Insanity[0]);
}
if (null != ramCalc)
{
for (int i = 0; i < cacheEntries.Length; i++)
{
cacheEntries[i].EstimateSize(ramCalc);
}
}
// the indirect mapping lets MapOfSet dedup identical valIds for us
//
// maps the (valId) identityhashCode of cache values to
// sets of CacheEntry instances
MapOfSets <int, CacheEntry> valIdToItems = new MapOfSets <int, CacheEntry>(new Dictionary <int, Dictionary <CacheEntry, CacheEntry> >(17));
// maps ReaderField keys to Sets of ValueIds
MapOfSets <ReaderField, int> readerFieldToValIds = new MapOfSets <ReaderField, int>(new Dictionary <ReaderField, Dictionary <int, int> >(17));
//
// any keys that we know result in more then one valId
// TODO: This will be a HashSet<T> when we start using .NET Framework 3.5
Dictionary <ReaderField, ReaderField> valMismatchKeys = new Dictionary <ReaderField, ReaderField>();
// iterate over all the cacheEntries to get the mappings we'll need
for (int i = 0; i < cacheEntries.Length; i++)
{
CacheEntry item = cacheEntries[i];
System.Object val = item.GetValue();
if (val is Mono.Lucene.Net.Search.CreationPlaceholder)
{
continue;
}
ReaderField rf = new ReaderField(item.GetReaderKey(), item.GetFieldName());
System.Int32 valId = val.GetHashCode();
// indirect mapping, so the MapOfSet will dedup identical valIds for us
valIdToItems.Put(valId, item);
if (1 < readerFieldToValIds.Put(rf, valId))
{
if (!valMismatchKeys.ContainsKey(rf))
{
valMismatchKeys.Add(rf, rf);
}
}
}
List <Insanity> insanity = new List <Insanity>(valMismatchKeys.Count * 3);
insanity.AddRange(CheckValueMismatch(valIdToItems, readerFieldToValIds, valMismatchKeys));
insanity.AddRange(CheckSubreaders(valIdToItems, readerFieldToValIds));
return(insanity.ToArray());
}
/// <summary> Internal helper method used by check that iterates over
/// the keys of readerFieldToValIds and generates a Collection
/// of Insanity instances whenever two (or more) ReaderField instances are
/// found that have an ancestery relationships.
///
/// </summary>
/// <seealso cref="InsanityType.SUBREADER">
/// </seealso>
private List <Insanity> CheckSubreaders(MapOfSets <int, CacheEntry> valIdToItems, MapOfSets <ReaderField, int> readerFieldToValIds)
{
List <Insanity> insanity = new List <Insanity>(23);
Dictionary <ReaderField, Dictionary <ReaderField, ReaderField> > badChildren = new Dictionary <ReaderField, Dictionary <ReaderField, ReaderField> >(17);
MapOfSets <ReaderField, ReaderField> badKids = new MapOfSets <ReaderField, ReaderField>(badChildren); // wrapper
IDictionary <int, Dictionary <CacheEntry, CacheEntry> > viToItemSets = valIdToItems.GetMap();
IDictionary <ReaderField, Dictionary <int, int> > rfToValIdSets = readerFieldToValIds.GetMap();
Dictionary <ReaderField, ReaderField> seen = new Dictionary <ReaderField, ReaderField>(17);
foreach (ReaderField rf in rfToValIdSets.Keys)
{
if (seen.ContainsKey(rf))
{
continue;
}
System.Collections.IList kids = GetAllDecendentReaderKeys(rf.readerKey);
for (int i = 0; i < kids.Count; i++)
{
ReaderField kid = new ReaderField(kids[i], rf.fieldName);
if (badChildren.ContainsKey(kid))
{
// we've already process this kid as RF and found other problems
// track those problems as our own
badKids.Put(rf, kid);
badKids.PutAll(rf, badChildren[kid]);
badChildren.Remove(kid);
}
else if (rfToValIdSets.ContainsKey(kid))
{
// we have cache entries for the kid
badKids.Put(rf, kid);
}
if (!seen.ContainsKey(kid))
{
seen.Add(kid, kid);
}
}
if (!seen.ContainsKey(rf))
{
seen.Add(rf, rf);
}
}
// every mapping in badKids represents an Insanity
foreach (ReaderField parent in badChildren.Keys)
{
Dictionary <ReaderField, ReaderField> kids = badChildren[parent];
List <CacheEntry> badEntries = new List <CacheEntry>(kids.Count * 2);
// put parent entr(ies) in first
{
foreach (int val in rfToValIdSets[parent].Keys)
{
badEntries.AddRange(viToItemSets[val].Keys);
}
}
// now the entries for the descendants
foreach (ReaderField kid in kids.Keys)
{
foreach (int val in rfToValIdSets[kid].Keys)
{
badEntries.AddRange(viToItemSets[val].Keys);
}
}
insanity.Add(new Insanity(InsanityType.SUBREADER, "Found caches for decendents of " + parent.ToString(), badEntries.ToArray()));
}
return(insanity);
}