public static ConnectionInfo FindConnection(TileRegion regionA, TileRegion regionB)
{
Assert.IsNotNull(regionA);
Assert.IsNotNull(regionB);
Assert.AreNotEqual(regionA, regionB);
var bestConnection = new TempConnection(Coord.zero, Coord.zero, float.MaxValue);
int indexA = 0;
while (indexA < regionA.Count)
{
int indexB = 0;
var bestThisLoop = new TempConnection(regionA[indexA], Coord.zero, float.MaxValue);
while (indexB < regionB.Count)
{
Coord tileB = regionB[indexB];
float distance = bestThisLoop.tileA.Distance(tileB);
if (distance < bestThisLoop.distance)
{
bestThisLoop = new TempConnection(bestThisLoop.tileA, tileB, distance);
}
indexB += (int)distance; // distance is never < 1, as minimum occurs with diagonally adjacent tiles
}
if (bestThisLoop.distance < bestConnection.distance)
{
bestConnection = bestThisLoop;
}
indexA += (int)bestThisLoop.distance;
}
return(new ConnectionInfo(bestConnection.tileA, bestConnection.tileB, regionA.Index, regionB.Index, bestConnection.distance));
}
/* The following method has some subtleties to it that need to be explained. The purpose of it is to trace out the
* floor tiles in the room that are adjacent to a wall tile. The tricky part is ensuring that this is done
* in an orderly fashion, i.e. that it traces out a more or less continuous path (some error is fine, but a random
* ordering is not, as the ordering of the edge tiles is needed for an enormous optimization in the connectivity
* algorithm used elsewhere).
*
* The basic idea is to start on an edge tile, and then perform a depth-first search along edge tiles. The difficulty
* comes from two situations. First, consider this example:
*
* x x o
* x x o
* 1 2 o
* o o o
*
* x represents wall, o represents floor, numbers represent the path travelled (and the order). If we only
* look at horizontal neighbors, the search will terminate at 2, because no adjacent floor is adjacent to a wall.
* So we need to look at diagonal neighbors. That leads to the following problem:
*
* x x x x
* x x o x
* x 3 x x
* 1 2 x x
*
* The remaining o is not connected to the path so far, but it's diagonally adjacent to the 3. This is handled
* by explicitly checking for this situation: in order to take a diagonal jump, one of the
* two adjacent tiles must be a floor. i.e. one of these situations:
*
* x x x x x x x x x x x x
* x x o x x o o x x o o x
* x 3 o x x 3 x x x 3 o x
* 1 2 x x 1 2 x x 1 2 x x
*
* The final complexity is the possibility of the path jumping, leading to irregularities in the edges.
* Example:
*
* x x o o o 8 x
* x x 4 5 6 7 x
* 1 2 3 x x o x
* o o o x x o x
*
* Ultimately this level of error is accepted as is. */
/// <summary>
/// Extract the edge tiles from this region.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="region">Must not be empty.</param>
public TileRegion Extract(TileRegion region)
{
Assert.AreNotEqual(region.Count, 0, "Room is empty!");
var boundary = new Boundary(map.Length, map.Width);
var edgeTiles = new List <Coord>(region.Count);
var stack = new Stack <Coord>();
Coord firstTile = GetStartingEdgeTile(map, region);
stack.Push(firstTile);
edgeTiles.Add(firstTile);
visited[firstTile.x, firstTile.y] = true;
while (stack.Count > 0)
{
Coord tile = stack.Pop();
foreach (Coord adj in GetAdjacentCoords(tile, pooledAdjacentTiles))
{
if (boundary.IsInBounds(adj) && !visited[adj.x, adj.y] && FoundEdgeTile(tile, adj, map))
{
visited[adj.x, adj.y] = true;
stack.Push(adj);
edgeTiles.Add(adj);
}
}
}
return(new TileRegion(edgeTiles, region.Index));
}
static TileRegion[] ExtractEdges(Map map, List <TileRegion> regions)
{
var extractor = new EdgeExtractor(map);
var rooms = new TileRegion[regions.Count];
for (int i = 0; i < rooms.Length; i++)
{
rooms[i] = extractor.Extract(regions[i]);
}
return(rooms);
}
static Coord GetStartingEdgeTile(Map map, TileRegion region)
{
// Note that in practice, this should return the very first item in alltiles.
return(region.First(tile => map.IsAdjacentToWall(tile.x, tile.y)));
}
