//public class LinearSolutionEventArgs : EventArgs
//{
// public int VariableCount { get; private set; }
// public int ConstraintCount { get; private set; }
// public LinearResultStatus ResultStatus { get; private set; }
// public dynamic SolutionValues { get; private set; }
// internal LinearSolutionEventArgs(int variableCount, int constraintCount, LinearResultStatus resultStatus,
// dynamic solutionValues)
// {
// VariableCount = variableCount;
// ConstraintCount = constraintCount;
// ResultStatus = resultStatus;
// SolutionValues = solutionValues;
// }
//}
//public event EventHandler<LinearSolutionEventArgs> Solved;
//private void OnSolved(LinearSolutionEventArgs e)
//{
// Solved?.Invoke(this, e);
//}
protected override void ReceiveSolution(Solver solver, LinearResultStatus resultStatus, dynamic problem)
{
var solution = resultStatus == Optimal || resultStatus == Feasible;
var e = new SolutionEventArgs(solver, resultStatus, solution, GetSolutionValues(problem));
OnSolved(e);
}
public void VerifyThatFeasibilityProblemSolverCorrect()
{
Func <double, double> round = Math.Round;
using (var s = new FeasibleRegionProblemSolver())
{
s.Solved += (sender, e) =>
{
const LinearResultStatus optimal = Optimal;
/* The numbers really ARE NOT that perfect, they are CLOSE, within fraction
* of 0.0001, but for rounding. It is also not necessarily the case where
* Rounding is a Solver issue, but a unit test one. */
Assert.That(e.VariableCount, Is.EqualTo(2));
Assert.That(e.ConstraintCount, Is.EqualTo(3));
Assert.That(e.ResultStatus, Is.EqualTo(optimal));
Assert.That(round(e.Solution), Is.EqualTo(34d));
Assert.That(round(e.SolutionValues.x), Is.EqualTo(6d));
Assert.That(round(e.SolutionValues.y), Is.EqualTo(4d));
};
Assert.That(s.TryResolve(), Is.True);
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Internal Constructor
/// </summary>
/// <param name="solver"></param>
/// <param name="resultStatus"></param>
/// <param name="solution"></param>
/// <param name="solutionValues"></param>
/// <inheritdoc />
public SolutionEventArgs(Solver solver, LinearResultStatus resultStatus, TSolution solution
, dynamic solutionValues)
{
VariableCount = solver.NumVariables();
ConstraintCount = solver.NumConstraints();
ResultStatus = resultStatus;
Solution = solution;
SolutionValues = solutionValues;
}
// ReSharper disable once UnusedMember.Global /// <summary> /// Receives the <paramref name="resultStatus"/> and <paramref name="problem"/>. /// </summary> /// <param name="solver"></param> /// <param name="resultStatus"></param> /// <param name="problem"></param> protected abstract void ReceiveSolution(Solver solver, LinearResultStatus resultStatus, dynamic problem);
/// <summary>
/// Receives the <paramref name="solution"/> and <paramref name="resultStatus"/>.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="solver"></param>
/// <param name="resultStatus"></param>
/// <param name="solution"></param>
/// <param name="problem"></param>
protected void ReceiveSolution(Solver solver, LinearResultStatus resultStatus,
TSolution solution, dynamic problem)
{
OnSolved(new SolutionEventArgs(solver, resultStatus, solution, GetSolutionValues(problem)));
}
/// <summary>
/// Verifies the <paramref name="solver"/> Solution.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="solver"></param>
/// <param name="resultStatus"></param>
/// <returns></returns>
protected virtual bool VerifySolution(Solver solver, LinearResultStatus resultStatus)
{
return(AcceptableResultStatuses.Contains(resultStatus));
}
protected override bool VerifySolution(Solver solver, LinearResultStatus resultStatus)
{
/* The solution looks legit; however, when using solvers other than GLOP_LINEAR_PROGRAMMING,
* verifying the solution is highly recommended! */
return(base.VerifySolution(solver, resultStatus) && solver.VerifySolution(1e-7, true));
}