// TODO: Consider putting check for null to derived classes.
public virtual void Add(T item)
{
EqtAssert.ParameterNotNull(item, "item");
if (!this.container.Contains(item))
{
this.container.Add(item, null); // Do not want to xml-persist the value.
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Removes specified item from collection.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="item">The item to remove.</param>
/// <returns>True if collection contained the item, otherwise false.</returns>
public virtual bool Remove(T item)
{
EqtAssert.ParameterNotNull(item, "item"); // This is to be consistent with Add...
if (this.container.Contains(item))
{
this.container.Remove(item);
return(true);
}
return(false);
}
/// <summary>
/// Copy constructor. Shallow copy.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="other">The object to copy items from.</param>
protected EqtBaseCollection(EqtBaseCollection <T> other)
{
EqtAssert.ParameterNotNull(other, "other");
this.container = new Hashtable(other.container);
}
/// <summary>
/// Copies all items to the array.
/// As FxCop recommends, this is an explicit implementation and derived classes need to define strongly typed CopyTo.
/// </summary>
public virtual void CopyTo(T[] array, int index)
{
EqtAssert.ParameterNotNull(array, "array");
this.container.Keys.CopyTo(array, index);
}
