// TODO: Is this sufficient? I wonder what a function pointer that returns
// a function pointer looks like...
protected override ColorString GetColorName()
{
if (null == m_colorName)
{
var cs = new ColorString();
cs.Append(DbgProvider.ColorizeTypeName(ReturnType.Name));
cs.Append(" (*fn)( ");
if (0 == Arguments.Count)
{
cs.Append(DbgProvider.ColorizeTypeName("void"));
cs.Append(" ");
}
else
{
for (int i = 0; i < Arguments.Count; i++)
{
cs.Append(DbgProvider.ColorizeTypeName(Arguments[i].ArgType.Name));
if (i < (Arguments.Count - 1))
{
cs.Append(",");
}
cs.Append(" ");
}
}
m_colorName = cs.Append(")").MakeReadOnly();
}
return(m_colorName);
} // end GetColorName()
public override ColorString ToColorString()
{
var cs = new ColorString().Append(DbgProvider.ColorizeModuleName(m_sym.Module.Name))
.Append("!")
.Append(DbgProvider.ColorizeTypeName(m_sym.Name));
return(cs);
}
public override ColorString ToColorString()
{
// TODO: This is the same as the DbgNativeFunction... factor out?
// Or factor Module "in"? (Because maybe not all functions would have a
// module?)
var cs = new ColorString().Append(DbgProvider.ColorizeModuleName(Module.Name))
.Append("!")
.Append(DbgProvider.ColorizeTypeName(Name));
return(cs);
}
} // end Module
public override ColorString ToColorString()
{
ColorString cs = new ColorString();
if (null != Module)
{
cs.Append(DbgProvider.ColorizeModuleName(Module.Name)).Append("!");
}
cs.Append(DbgProvider.ColorizeTypeName(Name));
return(cs);
}
protected virtual ColorString GetColorName()
{
return(DbgProvider.ColorizeTypeName(Name));
} // end GetColorName()
