void warn_add_OBJ_field_defaulting_to_basic_field_type(string field_name, string arch_tag, FieldType type)
{
warn_at();
Form1.stdout.print(" Archetype '{1}' does not define OBJ field '{0}', defaulting type to '{2}'\n",
field_name, arch_tag, type.ToString());
}
void warn_add_OBJ_field_mismatch_with_archetype_field(Obj obj, string field_name, FieldType obj_field_type)
{
warn_at();
Form1.stdout.print(" Field type mismatch with Archetype '{1}', ignoring OBJ field '{0}',\n" +
" obj_field_type '{2}' != arch_field_type '{3}'\n",
field_name, obj.archetype.tag, obj_field_type.ToString(), obj.archetype[field_name].type.ToString());
}
void print_debug_for_add_list_field(string field_name, FieldType type, List<int> list_int, List<string> list_string, List<decimal> list_decimal)
{
return; // Comment out to re-enable debug output. Goes well with the debug output in parse_OBJ_decl()
Form1.stdout.print(" OBJ add_field(name={0}, type={1},[", field_name, type.ToString() );
if (list_int != null) { foreach (int ii in list_int ) { Form1.stdout.print("{0}, ", ii); } }
if (list_string != null) { foreach (string ss in list_string ) { Form1.stdout.print("'{0}', ", ss); } }
if (list_decimal != null) { foreach (decimal dd in list_decimal) { Form1.stdout.print("{0}M, ", dd); } }
Form1.stdout.print("]\n");
}