// I don't like that a demand point has to know about resource amount here
private void TrySatisfyDemand(AResource resource)
{
// we assume that satisfying demands only in a consecutive way is possible
if (m_Demands.Count <= 0)
{
Debug.Log("No demands to satisfy");
return;
}
Demand demandToSatisfy = m_Demands.First.Value;
if (demandToSatisfy.Resource != resource)
{
Debug.LogFormat("Demand {0}: {1} is not possible to satisfy, wrong resource: {2}",
demandToSatisfy.Resource.ResourceBlueprint.Name, demandToSatisfy.DemandValue, resource.ResourceBlueprint.Name);
return;
}
if (demandToSatisfy.DemandValue > resource.Amount)
{
Debug.LogFormat("Demand {0}: {1} is not possible to satisfy, no resources available: {2}",
demandToSatisfy.Resource.ResourceBlueprint.Name, demandToSatisfy.DemandValue, resource.Amount);
return;
}
SatisfyDemand(demandToSatisfy);
}
// it is something we could override for a different behaviour of a demand point
protected virtual void GenerateDemand()
{
AResource resource = m_ResourcesCollection.GetRandom();
if (resource == null)
{
Debug.LogError("No resources are set up! Look at resources collection.");
return;
}
Vector2 demandRange = resource.ResourceBlueprint.DemandRange;
// I just wanted int for better UI visibility, no better reason for that
int demandValue = Random.Range((int)demandRange.x, (int)demandRange.y + 1);
Demand demand = new Demand(resource, demandValue);
m_Demands.AddLast(demand);
OnDemandGenerated.Invoke(demand);
}