/// <summary>
/// Returns if the current thread should stop processing work on the thread pool.
/// A thread should stop processing work on the thread pool when work remains only when
/// there are more worker threads in the thread pool than we currently want.
/// </summary>
/// <returns>Whether or not this thread should stop processing work even if there is still work in the queue.</returns>
internal static bool ShouldStopProcessingWorkNow(PortableThreadPool threadPoolInstance)
{
ThreadCounts counts = threadPoolInstance._separated.counts;
while (true)
{
// When there are more threads processing work than the thread count goal, it may have been decided
// to decrease the number of threads. Stop processing if the counts can be updated. We may have more
// threads existing than the thread count goal and that is ok, the cold ones will eventually time out if
// the thread count goal is not increased again. This logic is a bit different from the original CoreCLR
// code from which this implementation was ported, which turns a processing thread into a retired thread
// and checks for pending requests like RemoveWorkingWorker. In this implementation there are
// no retired threads, so only the count of threads processing work is considered.
if (counts.NumProcessingWork <= counts.NumThreadsGoal)
{
return(false);
}
ThreadCounts newCounts = counts;
newCounts.SubtractNumProcessingWork(1);
ThreadCounts oldCounts = threadPoolInstance._separated.counts.InterlockedCompareExchange(newCounts, counts);
if (oldCounts == counts)
{
return(true);
}
counts = oldCounts;
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Reduce the number of working workers by one, but maybe add back a worker (possibily this thread) if a thread request comes in while we are marking this thread as not working.
/// </summary>
private static void RemoveWorkingWorker(PortableThreadPool threadPoolInstance)
{
ThreadCounts currentCounts = threadPoolInstance._separated.counts.VolatileRead();
while (true)
{
ThreadCounts newCounts = currentCounts;
newCounts.SubtractNumProcessingWork(1);
ThreadCounts oldCounts = threadPoolInstance._separated.counts.InterlockedCompareExchange(newCounts, currentCounts);
if (oldCounts == currentCounts)
{
break;
}
currentCounts = oldCounts;
}
// It's possible that we decided we had thread requests just before a request came in,
// but reduced the worker count *after* the request came in. In this case, we might
// miss the notification of a thread request. So we wake up a thread (maybe this one!)
// if there is work to do.
if (threadPoolInstance._separated.numRequestedWorkers > 0)
{
MaybeAddWorkingWorker(threadPoolInstance);
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Reduce the number of working workers by one, but maybe add back a worker (possibily this thread) if a thread request comes in while we are marking this thread as not working.
/// </summary>
private static void RemoveWorkingWorker(PortableThreadPool threadPoolInstance)
{
ThreadCounts currentCounts = threadPoolInstance._separated.counts.VolatileRead();
while (true)
{
ThreadCounts newCounts = currentCounts;
newCounts.SubtractNumProcessingWork(1);
ThreadCounts oldCounts = threadPoolInstance._separated.counts.InterlockedCompareExchange(newCounts, currentCounts);
if (oldCounts == currentCounts)
{
break;
}
currentCounts = oldCounts;
}
if (currentCounts.NumProcessingWork > 1)
{
// In highly bursty cases with short bursts of work, especially in the portable thread pool implementation,
// worker threads are being released and entering Dispatch very quickly, not finding much work in Dispatch,
// and soon afterwards going back to Dispatch, causing extra thrashing on data and some interlocked
// operations. If this is not the last thread to stop processing work, introduce a slight delay to help
// other threads make more efficient progress. The spin-wait is mainly for when the sleep is not effective
// due to there being no other threads to schedule.
Thread.UninterruptibleSleep0();
if (!Environment.IsSingleProcessor)
{
Thread.SpinWait(1);
}
}
// It's possible that we decided we had thread requests just before a request came in,
// but reduced the worker count *after* the request came in. In this case, we might
// miss the notification of a thread request. So we wake up a thread (maybe this one!)
// if there is work to do.
if (threadPoolInstance._separated.numRequestedWorkers > 0)
{
MaybeAddWorkingWorker(threadPoolInstance);
}
}
internal static void MaybeAddWorkingWorker(PortableThreadPool threadPoolInstance)
{
ThreadCounts counts = threadPoolInstance._separated.counts;
short numExistingThreads, numProcessingWork, newNumExistingThreads, newNumProcessingWork;
while (true)
{
numProcessingWork = counts.NumProcessingWork;
if (numProcessingWork >= counts.NumThreadsGoal)
{
return;
}
newNumProcessingWork = (short)(numProcessingWork + 1);
numExistingThreads = counts.NumExistingThreads;
newNumExistingThreads = Math.Max(numExistingThreads, newNumProcessingWork);
ThreadCounts newCounts = counts;
newCounts.NumProcessingWork = newNumProcessingWork;
newCounts.NumExistingThreads = newNumExistingThreads;
ThreadCounts oldCounts = threadPoolInstance._separated.counts.InterlockedCompareExchange(newCounts, counts);
if (oldCounts == counts)
{
break;
}
counts = oldCounts;
}
int toCreate = newNumExistingThreads - numExistingThreads;
int toRelease = newNumProcessingWork - numProcessingWork;
if (toRelease > 0)
{
s_semaphore.Release(toRelease);
}
while (toCreate > 0)
{
if (TryCreateWorkerThread())
{
toCreate--;
continue;
}
counts = threadPoolInstance._separated.counts;
while (true)
{
ThreadCounts newCounts = counts;
newCounts.SubtractNumProcessingWork((short)toCreate);
newCounts.SubtractNumExistingThreads((short)toCreate);
ThreadCounts oldCounts = threadPoolInstance._separated.counts.InterlockedCompareExchange(newCounts, counts);
if (oldCounts == counts)
{
break;
}
counts = oldCounts;
}
break;
}
}
