A blog post with a link to an example project here

TacticalDDD contains lightweight helpers that I find myself implementing over and over again related to DDD/Event Sourcing tactical patterns, such as Value Objects, Entities, AggregateRoots, EntityIds etc..

These helpers are mostly in the form of simple abstractions that provide help around equality and contain useful helper methods...

I am a big proponent of "Little copy is better than a little dependency" mantra, but I also believe there exists a small set of facts that should always be true when implementing DDD patterns. Keeping this in mind I did (and will) try to keep this package as thin and as pragmatic as possible.

Note: I assume that you are well versed in these topics.

Entity is something that has an Identity (Id), and thus this dictates Entity equality implementation, eg. an entity is equal to another entity if their Id's are equal. This is exactly what Entity abstract class provides: An Id and equality implementations.

EntityId is something that has to be serializable to string eg. it needs to implement ToString() method. I provided a helper record for you to use, named EntityId. It extends record instead of a class which means that it provides structural equality (more on value object below).

An example of Entity and an Entity Id:

public sealed record CustomerId : EntityId
{
    private Guid _guid;

    private CustomerId(string guid) =>
        Guid.Parse(guid);

    public CustomerId() =>
        _guid = Guid.NewGuid();

    // You might implement this static factory method in order to be able to
    // parse your id from string
    public static CustomerId Parse(string id) => new(id);

    // ToString implementation
    public override string ToString() => _guid.ToString();
}

public sealed class Customer : Entity<CustomerId>
{

}

This is how you would define an entity along with it's id.

What this tries to enforce is that your entities always have an id and that the id is a value object (avoiding primitive obsession). I will not go into much

details why this is useful.

Like you may already know aggregate root is an entity that sits on top of an aggregate tree. So in my implementation this is what it is. AggregateRoot extends Entity and provides same identity utilities.

One extra thing an AggregateRoot has is ability to deal with domain events, eg. it provides a public readonly collection of domain events and some protected methods to manage that collection.

In previous versions I had a separate AggregateRoot implementation that contained utility methods for an event sourced aggregate. In retrospect I think this was a bit confusing and redundant so in version 5.0.0 I decided to merge those two.

So for example if you decided that your Customer entity is in fact an aggregate, this is how you would implement it as an AggregateRoot:

public sealed class Customer : AggregateRoot<CustomerId>
{

}

Here is an example of an event sourced Customer aggregate:

public sealed class Customer : AggregateRoot<CustomerId>
{
    // We re-export constructor provided by our AggregateRoot implementation
    // which is used to rehydrate our aggregate from domain events
    public Customer(IEnumerable<DomainEvent> events) : base(events)
    {
    }

    // We want to encapsulate and thus hide parameterless constructor
    private Customer()
    {
    }

    // Use case method
    // (newName would preferably be value object in itself instead of a primitive type
    public void ChangeNameTo(string newName)
    {
        Apply(
            new CustomerChangedName
            {
                CreatedAt = DateTime.UtcNow, // Don't do this
                CustomerId = Id, // Notice how CustomerId is implicitly convertible to string
                NewName = newName
            }
        );
    }

    // This method is automagically called when we Apply a domain event and also
    // if we instantiate our aggregate via `public Customer(IEnumerable<IDomainEvent> events)`
    public void On(CustomerChangedName @event)
    {
        // ... implement the actual mutation
    }
}

// Our domain event
public sealed record CustomerChangedName : DomainEvent
{
    public string CustomerId { get; init; }

    public string NewName { get; init; }
}

Last but not least. Value objects imho are the most valuable pattern.

Prior to 5.0.0 this package contained ValueObject abstract class that helped with structural equality. With C# 9 this is no longer necessary so I ditched it.

Records pretty much provide you with all that is needed to create your own value objects. All you need to do is to provide your own constraints, mostly during creation / parsing.

With ValueObject being out of the picture, I did add another helper record named ConstrainedValue which provides a neat way of wrapping primitive types and adding simple constraints via built in data annotations in order to avoid primitive obsession.

An example usage of ConstrainedValue:

// We create a simple wrapper for our string that enforces
// string length. Second generic parameter enforces the type of exception
// thrown if validation fails.
public sealed record String10 : ConstrainedValue<string, DomainException>
{
    public String10(
        [MinLength(5)]
        [MaxLength(10)] string value) : base(value)
    {
    }
}

// Now our Name value object can simply be defined as:
public sealed record Name(String10 FirstName, String10 LastName);

// Value itself can simply be used as
var value = new String10("A value");

// And is implicitly assignable to it's generic type (in this case a string)
string val = value;

You can and should use ConstrainedValue in order to create simple wrappers around primitive types eg String50, PositiveInt, FutureDate etc... which contain simple constraints and which you then can compose into more complex value objects (records)